Multi‐Marker Approach to Reducing the Intermediate Range of a High Accuracy 2‐Cutoff Plasma p‐Tau 217 Test for Amyloid Detection

Abstract Background p‐Tau 217 is considered the most accurate single plasma biomarker for detecting amyloid pathology. Recent draft Alzheimer’s Association criteria for diagnosing Alzheimer’s recommends that p‐Tau 217 tests be designed with two cut‐offs in recognition of signal overlap between diseased and non‐diseased subjects. Two cutoffs maximizes the accuracy of the test, but leaves a diagnostic intermediate zone with uncertainty of amyloid status. It is desirable to minimize the indeterminant zone to reduce the number of patients receiving uncertain results. We investigated whether the inclusion of plasma amyloid b42/40 ratio, NfL, and GFAP into a multi‐marker logistic regression model including p‐Tau 217 would enable amyloid classification of uncertain results from p‐Tau 217 alone. Method We optimized diagnostic thresholds for the Simoa LucentAD p‐Tau 217 plasma test to achieve ≥90% accuracy for MCI and AD patients across 2 independent cohorts (Bio‐Hermes, n = 242, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, n = 737) representing divergent clinical settings, comparator methods, and geographic/ethnic/racial/mean age samplings. Across these diverse cohorts, the intermediate zone was 32.9%. Next we tested all samples for amyloid ratio, NfL, and GFAP using the Simoa N4PE kit. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed on all biomarker results to arrive at a probability scale. Samples with uncertain p‐Tau 217 results were re‐classified based on their probabilities being outside 90% lower and upper boundaries of the multi‐marker intermediate zone. Result Tables 1 and 2 exhibit preliminary amyloid classification results for p‐Tau 217 alone and the multi‐marker model respectively. “Amyloid Status” was determined by amyloid PET (Bio‐Hermes) or CSF biomarkers (Amsterdam). The multi‐marker model enabled amyloid classifications for 189 previously uncertain results. 137 uncertain results were re‐classified as positive (accuracy 88%), and 52 uncertain results were re‐classified as negative (accuracy 87%), reducing the intermediate zone 2.4‐fold from 32.9% to 13.7%. Conclusion Previous studies have found no benefit to combining additional AD‐relevant biomarkers with p‐Tau 217 to enhance accuracy. We show for the first time that additional biomarkers reduces the intermediate zone of a 2‐cutoff p‐Tau 217 test while preserving high accuracy. This finding can help provide amyloid status certainty for a greater number of symptomatic patients undergoing evaluation for Alzheimer’s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095706
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐Marker Approach to Reducing the Intermediate Range of a High Accuracy 2‐Cutoff Plasma p‐Tau 217 Test for Amyloid Detection

Argonde C. van Harten, David H. Wilson, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Patrick Sheehy et al.
3 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.16
article

Multi‐Marker Approach to Reducing the Intermediate Range of a High Accuracy 2‐Cutoff Plasma p‐Tau 217 Test for Amyloid Detection

Argonde C. van Harten, David H. Wilson, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Patrick Sheehy, Michele Wolfe, Attila Vaskó, Inge M.W. Verberk, Karen Copeland, Charlotte Elisabeth Teunissen, Mike Miller, Meenakshi Khare, Lyndal K. Hesterberg
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background p‐Tau 217 is considered the most accurate single plasma biomarker for detecting amyloid pathology. Recent draft Alzheimer’s Association criteria for diagnosing Alzheimer’s recommends that p‐Tau 217 tests be designed with two cut‐offs in recognition of signal overlap between diseased and non‐diseased subjects. Two cutoffs maximizes the accuracy of the test, but leaves a diagnostic intermediate zone with uncertainty of amyloid status. It is desirable to minimize the indeterminant zone to reduce the number of patients receiving uncertain results. We investigated whether the inclusion of plasma amyloid b42/40 ratio, NfL, and GFAP into a multi‐marker logistic regression model including p‐Tau 217 would enable amyloid classification of uncertain results from p‐Tau 217 alone. Method We optimized diagnostic thresholds for the Simoa LucentAD p‐Tau 217 plasma test to achieve ≥90% accuracy for MCI and AD patients across 2 independent cohorts (Bio‐Hermes, n = 242, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, n = 737) representing divergent clinical settings, comparator methods, and geographic/ethnic/racial/mean age samplings. Across these diverse cohorts, the intermediate zone was 32.9%. Next we tested all samples for amyloid ratio, NfL, and GFAP using the Simoa N4PE kit. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed on all biomarker results to arrive at a probability scale. Samples with uncertain p‐Tau 217 results were re‐classified based on their probabilities being outside 90% lower and upper boundaries of the multi‐marker intermediate zone. Result Tables 1 and 2 exhibit preliminary amyloid classification results for p‐Tau 217 alone and the multi‐marker model respectively. “Amyloid Status” was determined by amyloid PET (Bio‐Hermes) or CSF biomarkers (Amsterdam). The multi‐marker model enabled amyloid classifications for 189 previously uncertain results. 137 uncertain results were re‐classified as positive (accuracy 88%), and 52 uncertain results were re‐classified as negative (accuracy 87%), reducing the intermediate zone 2.4‐fold from 32.9% to 13.7%. Conclusion Previous studies have found no benefit to combining additional AD‐relevant biomarkers with p‐Tau 217 to enhance accuracy. We show for the first time that additional biomarkers reduces the intermediate zone of a 2‐cutoff p‐Tau 217 test while preserving high accuracy. This finding can help provide amyloid status certainty for a greater number of symptomatic patients undergoing evaluation for Alzheimer’s.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Quanterix (United States) (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi‐Marker Approach to Reducing the Intermediate Range of a High Accuracy 2‐Cutoff Plasma p‐Tau 217 Test for Amyloid Detection — Argonde C. van Harten, David H. Wilson, et al. · Alzheimer s & Dementia (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS