Safety of higher doses of gantenerumab in the open‐label extension of the DIAN–TU‐001 trial

Abstract Background The double‐blind (DB) period of the DIAN–TU‐001 phase 3 trial with gantenerumab provided evidence of significant but incomplete reduction of amyloid plaques, cerebrospinal fluid total tau, and phospho‐tau181 in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease (DIAD). 1 Subsequently, eligible participants transitioned to an open‐label extension (OLE) period using higher doses of gantenerumab (1500mg SC‐administered every two weeks [q2w]). Method 73 DIAD participants entered the OLE period. All participants titrated gantenerumab doses and received at least 3 doses at 120, 255, 510, and 1020mg‐q4wk. Subsequently, titration continued with 1020mg‐q2w for 6 doses and then to 1500mg‐q2w. During the OLE period, 62/73 (84.9%) participants completed titration to the higher doses (1020‐1500mg‐q2w). Result Overall, 30.1% (22/73) of the participants experienced ARIA‐E during the OLE (Figure 1); among those, 72.7% (n = 16/22) experienced ARIA‐E at higher doses (1020‐1500mg‐q2w). 2/3 (67%) APOE4 homozygous participants developed ARIA‐E, while 5/19 (26%) and 10/51 (19%) heterozygous or noncarriers developed ARIA‐E. Radiologically, 56.3% of the ARIA‐E episodes at higher doses were multifocal and had a predominant occipital distribution. The largest cross‐sectional diameter of ARIA‐E at initial findings ranged from 3 to 81mm. ARIA‐E lesions improved, generally, while dosing was held with a mean time for ARIA‐E resolution of 59.5 days. ARIA‐E frequency was higher in PSEN1 and APP variants (14/61 (23.0%) and 2/7 (28.6%), respectively) compared to PSEN‐2 variants (0/5). Most of the ARIA‐E cases (16/22) co‐occur with ARIA‐H; however, ARIA‐H also occurred in 14/51 participants who never had ARIA‐E. ARIA‐H risk increases as the disease progresses and is less frequent during asymptomatic phases of the disease and EYO ←10 (Figure 2). Conclusion Safety data from the DIAN‐TU‐001 OLE study indicate that tripling the dose of gantenerumab is well tolerated in DIAD populations, with the incidence and severity of adverse events remaining comparable to the DB period 1,2 and without new/unexpected safety findings. Most ARIA‐E episodes occurred after titration to doses of 1020‐1500mg‐q2w (16 of 22 participants with ARIA‐E in the OLE) and within the initial 3‐4 months of receiving the higher doses. Risks for ARIA‐E in DIAD parallel reported risks for gantenerumab in sporadic AD, including ApoE4 status and number of MCH. 3

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094830
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety of higher doses of gantenerumab in the open‐label extension of the DIAN–TU‐001 trial

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Alireza Atri, Randall John Bateman, Nelly Joseph‐Mathurin et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Safety of higher doses of gantenerumab in the open‐label extension of the DIAN–TU‐001 trial

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Alireza Atri, Randall John Bateman, Nelly Joseph‐Mathurin, Daniel Yen, Chengjie Xiong, Carsten Hofmann, Jakub Wojtowicz, Eric McDade, Guoqiao Wang, David B. Clifford, Andrew J. Aschenbrenner, Brian A. Gordon, Jorge J. Llibre‐Guerra, Yán Li, Jason J. Hassenstab, Richard J. Perrin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The double‐blind (DB) period of the DIAN–TU‐001 phase 3 trial with gantenerumab provided evidence of significant but incomplete reduction of amyloid plaques, cerebrospinal fluid total tau, and phospho‐tau181 in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease (DIAD). 1 Subsequently, eligible participants transitioned to an open‐label extension (OLE) period using higher doses of gantenerumab (1500mg SC‐administered every two weeks [q2w]). Method 73 DIAD participants entered the OLE period. All participants titrated gantenerumab doses and received at least 3 doses at 120, 255, 510, and 1020mg‐q4wk. Subsequently, titration continued with 1020mg‐q2w for 6 doses and then to 1500mg‐q2w. During the OLE period, 62/73 (84.9%) participants completed titration to the higher doses (1020‐1500mg‐q2w). Result Overall, 30.1% (22/73) of the participants experienced ARIA‐E during the OLE (Figure 1); among those, 72.7% (n = 16/22) experienced ARIA‐E at higher doses (1020‐1500mg‐q2w). 2/3 (67%) APOE4 homozygous participants developed ARIA‐E, while 5/19 (26%) and 10/51 (19%) heterozygous or noncarriers developed ARIA‐E. Radiologically, 56.3% of the ARIA‐E episodes at higher doses were multifocal and had a predominant occipital distribution. The largest cross‐sectional diameter of ARIA‐E at initial findings ranged from 3 to 81mm. ARIA‐E lesions improved, generally, while dosing was held with a mean time for ARIA‐E resolution of 59.5 days. ARIA‐E frequency was higher in PSEN1 and APP variants (14/61 (23.0%) and 2/7 (28.6%), respectively) compared to PSEN‐2 variants (0/5). Most of the ARIA‐E cases (16/22) co‐occur with ARIA‐H; however, ARIA‐H also occurred in 14/51 participants who never had ARIA‐E. ARIA‐H risk increases as the disease progresses and is less frequent during asymptomatic phases of the disease and EYO ←10 (Figure 2). Conclusion Safety data from the DIAN‐TU‐001 OLE study indicate that tripling the dose of gantenerumab is well tolerated in DIAD populations, with the incidence and severity of adverse events remaining comparable to the DB period 1,2 and without new/unexpected safety findings. Most ARIA‐E episodes occurred after titration to doses of 1020‐1500mg‐q2w (16 of 22 participants with ARIA‐E in the OLE) and within the initial 3‐4 months of receiving the higher doses. Risks for ARIA‐E in DIAD parallel reported risks for gantenerumab in sporadic AD, including ApoE4 status and number of MCH. 3

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Banner Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.