Developing a core outcome set for people living with mild cognitive impairment: Protocol for the MCI Core Outcomes Study

Abstract Background Core outcome sets (COS) are a set of outcomes which stakeholders agree should be collected and reported as part of a minimum dataset for studies in a clinical population. COS developed collaboratively with patients and other stakeholders encourage researchers to report outcomes which are considered important by affected individuals. COS may reduce heterogeneity of outcome selection allowing for better synthesis across studies (e.g., meta‐analysis) and reduce selective reporting of positive outcomes to support more informed healthcare decisions. There is currently no approved COS for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, we are collaborating with patient and public contributors to develop a COS for people with MCI. Method The study will involve three stages: 1) an umbrella review, which will provide outcomes from published studies by retrieving articles from systematic and scoping reviews of interventional studies involving people with MCI; 2) interviews with stakeholders with lived experience of MCI (people living with MCI and their partners/relatives) and relevant professional stakeholders (e.g., health and social care professionals or those from relevant charitable organisations or industry) will identify additional outcomes stakeholders consider important; 3) a “long list” of possible outcomes will be curated from Stage 1 and 2 and a two‐round Delphi survey process and consensus meeting(s) will identify the final COS to be recommended. Result The study is ongoing. The review is at the data extraction stage. From the first 25 studies, the most common outcome measurement instruments reported so far are all related to cognitive functioning: the Mini‐Mental State Examination (9/25, 36%), Trail Making Test (6/25, 24%), and Verbal Fluency Test (6/25, 24%). Updated results will be available for the conference. Interviews are anticipated to start in mid‐2024 with the COS published in 2025. Conclusion A COS for people with MCI will identify outcomes of importance for individuals affected by MCI and improve transparent outcome reporting in interventional research to better support patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094949
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a core outcome set for people living with mild cognitive impairment: Protocol for the MCI Core Outcomes Study

Elizabeth Coulthard, Nicholas Turner, Jemima Dooley, Angus McNair et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Developing a core outcome set for people living with mild cognitive impairment: Protocol for the MCI Core Outcomes Study

Elizabeth Coulthard, Nicholas Turner, Jemima Dooley, Angus McNair, Joseph Webb, Sarah Rudd, Julie Clayton, Victoria Grace Gabb, Sam A. Harding, Alan Richardson, Sophie Alderman, Winsome Barrett‐Muir, Natalie Woodward
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Core outcome sets (COS) are a set of outcomes which stakeholders agree should be collected and reported as part of a minimum dataset for studies in a clinical population. COS developed collaboratively with patients and other stakeholders encourage researchers to report outcomes which are considered important by affected individuals. COS may reduce heterogeneity of outcome selection allowing for better synthesis across studies (e.g., meta‐analysis) and reduce selective reporting of positive outcomes to support more informed healthcare decisions. There is currently no approved COS for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Therefore, we are collaborating with patient and public contributors to develop a COS for people with MCI. Method The study will involve three stages: 1) an umbrella review, which will provide outcomes from published studies by retrieving articles from systematic and scoping reviews of interventional studies involving people with MCI; 2) interviews with stakeholders with lived experience of MCI (people living with MCI and their partners/relatives) and relevant professional stakeholders (e.g., health and social care professionals or those from relevant charitable organisations or industry) will identify additional outcomes stakeholders consider important; 3) a “long list” of possible outcomes will be curated from Stage 1 and 2 and a two‐round Delphi survey process and consensus meeting(s) will identify the final COS to be recommended. Result The study is ongoing. The review is at the data extraction stage. From the first 25 studies, the most common outcome measurement instruments reported so far are all related to cognitive functioning: the Mini‐Mental State Examination (9/25, 36%), Trail Making Test (6/25, 24%), and Verbal Fluency Test (6/25, 24%). Updated results will be available for the conference. Interviews are anticipated to start in mid‐2024 with the COS published in 2025. Conclusion A COS for people with MCI will identify outcomes of importance for individuals affected by MCI and improve transparent outcome reporting in interventional research to better support patient care.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.