Assessment of the Empact of IGC‐AD1 on Hepatic Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease: Insights from a Phase 1 Trial

Abstract Background IGC‐AD1 comprises of Tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and melatonin. The two active pharmaceuticals are known for their neuroprotective properties. In this analysis we studied multiple dosing of IGC‐AD1 in Alzheimer’s (“AD”) populations vulnerable to hepatic complications. We present the impact of three different doses on hepatic functions, offering insights into dosage‐dependent safety and potential therapeutic implications. Method Thirteen Puerto Rican AD patients (mean age: 80.18±6.22 years, 70% women) participated in this three‐cohort trial to assess the effects of IGC‐AD1. Cohorts 1, 2 and 3 received 1 mL once, twice, or thrice daily, respectively, for 14 days (“EOT”) with ∼4‐day washout period between cohorts. Key hepatic and renal biomarkers measured at baseline and EOT included AST, ALT, ALP, total and direct bilirubin. Result Findings showed a larger increase in the mean difference of ALTI in the placebo group compared to active in cohorts 2 and 3 (Cohort‐1, Active; = ‐2.11 ± 6.01, Placebo = ‐0.5 ± 0.71; Cohort‐2, Active = ‐2.25 ± 4,79, Placebo = ‐8.0; Cohort‐3, Active; = ‐3.5 ± 9.73, Placebo = ‐7.0 ± 8.49). ALP levels decreased for both treatments in cohort 1 but increased for cohorts 2 and 3 (ALP Cohort‐1, Active; = 2.89 ± 4.34, Placebo = 3.5 ± 7.78; Cohort‐2, Active = ‐0.6± 18.15, Placebo = ‐5.0; Cohort‐3, Active; = ‐2.8 ±5.57, Placebo = ‐3.0 ± 7.07). Indirect bilirubin levels increased in the active groups for cohort 3, no tendency was observed for placebos (Indirect bilirubin Cohort‐1, Active; = 0.02 ± 0.05, Placebo = 0.05 ± 0.03; Cohort‐2, Active = 0.07 ± 0.07, Placebo = ‐0.03; Cohort‐3, Active; = ‐0.04 ± 0.14, Placebo = 0.07). All other biomarkers were within expected ranges, supporting the treatment’s safety profile. Conclusion Based on this safety trial, the findings suggest that the treatment with THC and melatonin does not exert adverse effects on liver function in patients with AD. Overall, the treatment demonstrated good tolerability, with no significant differences in hepatic biomarkers compared to placebo, supporting its potential safety in elderly patients with AD. Future research should continue to monitor these biomarkers in larger, more diverse populations to confirm these findings and assess long‐term safety and efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095744
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Empact of IGC‐AD1 on Hepatic Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease: Insights from a Phase 1 Trial

Varduhi Ghazaryan, Evelyn Gutiérrez, María Alejandra Tangarife, Claudia Grimaldi et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Assessment of the Empact of IGC‐AD1 on Hepatic Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease: Insights from a Phase 1 Trial

Varduhi Ghazaryan, Evelyn Gutiérrez, María Alejandra Tangarife, Claudia Grimaldi, Abbey J. Canon, Laura Delgado‐Murillo, Diego Rodriguez‐Soacha, Ram Mukunda, William Julio De Jesus, Laura Sánchez, Jagadeesh S. Rao, María Juanita Arbelaez, Margarita Venegas, Elliot Hong, Saadia Shahnawaz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background IGC‐AD1 comprises of Tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and melatonin. The two active pharmaceuticals are known for their neuroprotective properties. In this analysis we studied multiple dosing of IGC‐AD1 in Alzheimer’s (“AD”) populations vulnerable to hepatic complications. We present the impact of three different doses on hepatic functions, offering insights into dosage‐dependent safety and potential therapeutic implications. Method Thirteen Puerto Rican AD patients (mean age: 80.18±6.22 years, 70% women) participated in this three‐cohort trial to assess the effects of IGC‐AD1. Cohorts 1, 2 and 3 received 1 mL once, twice, or thrice daily, respectively, for 14 days (“EOT”) with ∼4‐day washout period between cohorts. Key hepatic and renal biomarkers measured at baseline and EOT included AST, ALT, ALP, total and direct bilirubin. Result Findings showed a larger increase in the mean difference of ALTI in the placebo group compared to active in cohorts 2 and 3 (Cohort‐1, Active; = ‐2.11 ± 6.01, Placebo = ‐0.5 ± 0.71; Cohort‐2, Active = ‐2.25 ± 4,79, Placebo = ‐8.0; Cohort‐3, Active; = ‐3.5 ± 9.73, Placebo = ‐7.0 ± 8.49). ALP levels decreased for both treatments in cohort 1 but increased for cohorts 2 and 3 (ALP Cohort‐1, Active; = 2.89 ± 4.34, Placebo = 3.5 ± 7.78; Cohort‐2, Active = ‐0.6± 18.15, Placebo = ‐5.0; Cohort‐3, Active; = ‐2.8 ±5.57, Placebo = ‐3.0 ± 7.07). Indirect bilirubin levels increased in the active groups for cohort 3, no tendency was observed for placebos (Indirect bilirubin Cohort‐1, Active; = 0.02 ± 0.05, Placebo = 0.05 ± 0.03; Cohort‐2, Active = 0.07 ± 0.07, Placebo = ‐0.03; Cohort‐3, Active; = ‐0.04 ± 0.14, Placebo = 0.07). All other biomarkers were within expected ranges, supporting the treatment’s safety profile. Conclusion Based on this safety trial, the findings suggest that the treatment with THC and melatonin does not exert adverse effects on liver function in patients with AD. Overall, the treatment demonstrated good tolerability, with no significant differences in hepatic biomarkers compared to placebo, supporting its potential safety in elderly patients with AD. Future research should continue to monitor these biomarkers in larger, more diverse populations to confirm these findings and assess long‐term safety and efficacy.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
University of Puerto Rico at Bayamón (PR), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.