Geospatial Patterns and Behavioural Responses of Elephants to Cattle and Mortality Risk in a Pastoralist Maasai Mara Landscape, Kenya

The unprecedented pace and scale of anthropogenic changes to environments and direct species harvesting are causing substantial wildlife species declines globally. For many species, behavioural plasticity forms the first line of response to exploitation and environments altered by humans. Although behavioural plasticity can enhance survival in altered environments, maladaptive behavioral scenarios or “evolutionary traps” can threaten the persistence of some species from anthropogenic alteration. In elephants, poaching bias towards older individuals. Altered social structures and habitats may impact decision making of elephant social groups in anthropogenic landscapes creating maladaptive responses that can amplify conflict. In this study, we examined geospatial patterns of elephant mortality risk, cattle distribution, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and habitat protection status on elephant distribution and group-sizes at the Maasai Mara National Reserve (MMNR), Community Wildlife Conservancies (CWC) and surrounding Community Grazing Lands (CGL) in the Maasai Mara ecosystem. We also investigated how social group type, group-size, age of the oldest individual in a group and habitat openness influence elephant response to experimental cowbells. Using kernel density analyses from ten years of georeferenced clinical reports pertaining to elephant injuries and elephant mortality due to poaching, we show that elephant injuries and mortalities were highest in CWC and CGL compared to MMNR. Our study showed a positive relationship between elephant group-size with NDVI, and the risk of elephant mortality or injury. Concealed cowbells played to elephants revealed that elephant aggression towards cowbells was not influenced by matriarch age, group-size, habitat type or status of habitat protection. However, defensive bunching was positively related to the matriarch’s age, group-size and social group type. These results suggest sensitivity of older matriarchs to poaching risk and that elephants use group defense or avoidance behavioural strategies irrespective of vegetation cover.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geography Environment and Earth Science International
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2024/v28i12851
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geospatial Patterns and Behavioural Responses of Elephants to Cattle and Mortality Risk in a Pastoralist Maasai Mara Landscape, Kenya

Mika Siljander, David Kimutai Korir, Lilian Adionyi, Flora Namu
Journal of Geography Environment and Earth Science International
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Geospatial Patterns and Behavioural Responses of Elephants to Cattle and Mortality Risk in a Pastoralist Maasai Mara Landscape, Kenya

Mika Siljander, David Kimutai Korir, Lilian Adionyi, Flora Namu
article en

Abstract

The unprecedented pace and scale of anthropogenic changes to environments and direct species harvesting are causing substantial wildlife species declines globally. For many species, behavioural plasticity forms the first line of response to exploitation and environments altered by humans. Although behavioural plasticity can enhance survival in altered environments, maladaptive behavioral scenarios or “evolutionary traps” can threaten the persistence of some species from anthropogenic alteration. In elephants, poaching bias towards older individuals. Altered social structures and habitats may impact decision making of elephant social groups in anthropogenic landscapes creating maladaptive responses that can amplify conflict. In this study, we examined geospatial patterns of elephant mortality risk, cattle distribution, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and habitat protection status on elephant distribution and group-sizes at the Maasai Mara National Reserve (MMNR), Community Wildlife Conservancies (CWC) and surrounding Community Grazing Lands (CGL) in the Maasai Mara ecosystem. We also investigated how social group type, group-size, age of the oldest individual in a group and habitat openness influence elephant response to experimental cowbells. Using kernel density analyses from ten years of georeferenced clinical reports pertaining to elephant injuries and elephant mortality due to poaching, we show that elephant injuries and mortalities were highest in CWC and CGL compared to MMNR. Our study showed a positive relationship between elephant group-size with NDVI, and the risk of elephant mortality or injury. Concealed cowbells played to elephants revealed that elephant aggression towards cowbells was not influenced by matriarch age, group-size, habitat type or status of habitat protection. However, defensive bunching was positively related to the matriarch’s age, group-size and social group type. These results suggest sensitivity of older matriarchs to poaching risk and that elephants use group defense or avoidance behavioural strategies irrespective of vegetation cover.

Journal of Geography Environment and Earth Science InternationalVol. 28(12)
University of Helsinki (FI), Kenya Wildlife Service (KE), Karatina University (KE)
Koneen Säätiö
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.