How value‐based healthcare can improve the work of memory clinics

Abstract Background Value‐based healthcare (VBHC) is a novel concept derived from economic research which is recently implemented in various medical departments and facilities. Additionally to an improvement of patient care, it postulates a reduction of expenses by providing patients with what they really need. Value in this context is defined as outcomes achieved for patients relative to the required costs. In VBHC collecting patient‐reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient‐reported experience measures (PREM) is essential to clarify patients’ needs. According to the VBHC approach, a modification of patient care based on PROM and PREM achieves a higher value and more efficient treatment for patients. We have implemented the VBHC approach at two German memory clinics to test its applicability in this novel setting. We expect to gain concrete aspects for improving the diagnostic process for patients, relatives, and employees. Methods In each memory clinic we interviewed 25 patient‐relative dyads with regard to PREM and PROM. In addition, we conducted an employee survey about current problems and potential suggestions for improvement. Based on these results, respective modifications of the diagnostic process took place in both memory clinics. Thereafter a second evaluation, interviewing another set of 25 dyads was carried out. Results In the first evaluation the majority of patients of both memory clinics quoted the length of the diagnostic process as main negative experience. The duration from the first visit to the final diagnosis took several months which was experienced as highly stressful for patients and their relatives. Hence, the diagnostic process was shortened to a duration of approx. 3‐4 weeks. In the second evaluation preliminary data indicate a significantly better experience of patients and family members with the diagnostic process (PREM) after modification. Other aspects reported by patients, relatives as well as employees offer additional perspectives for improvement. Conclusions This is the first study implementing the VBHC approach in a memory clinic setting. We found that VBHC can indeed improve patient care and may contribute in establishing a standardized and optimized procedure in the diagnostic processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089190
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How value‐based healthcare can improve the work of memory clinics

Gloria Spielmann‐Benson, Anna R. Schönberger, Lucrezia Hausner, Ann‐Katrin Schild et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

How value‐based healthcare can improve the work of memory clinics

Gloria Spielmann‐Benson, Anna R. Schönberger, Lucrezia Hausner, Ann‐Katrin Schild, Frank Jessen, Arnd Steinmetz, Lutz Frölich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Value‐based healthcare (VBHC) is a novel concept derived from economic research which is recently implemented in various medical departments and facilities. Additionally to an improvement of patient care, it postulates a reduction of expenses by providing patients with what they really need. Value in this context is defined as outcomes achieved for patients relative to the required costs. In VBHC collecting patient‐reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient‐reported experience measures (PREM) is essential to clarify patients’ needs. According to the VBHC approach, a modification of patient care based on PROM and PREM achieves a higher value and more efficient treatment for patients. We have implemented the VBHC approach at two German memory clinics to test its applicability in this novel setting. We expect to gain concrete aspects for improving the diagnostic process for patients, relatives, and employees. Methods In each memory clinic we interviewed 25 patient‐relative dyads with regard to PREM and PROM. In addition, we conducted an employee survey about current problems and potential suggestions for improvement. Based on these results, respective modifications of the diagnostic process took place in both memory clinics. Thereafter a second evaluation, interviewing another set of 25 dyads was carried out. Results In the first evaluation the majority of patients of both memory clinics quoted the length of the diagnostic process as main negative experience. The duration from the first visit to the final diagnosis took several months which was experienced as highly stressful for patients and their relatives. Hence, the diagnostic process was shortened to a duration of approx. 3‐4 weeks. In the second evaluation preliminary data indicate a significantly better experience of patients and family members with the diagnostic process (PREM) after modification. Other aspects reported by patients, relatives as well as employees offer additional perspectives for improvement. Conclusions This is the first study implementing the VBHC approach in a memory clinic setting. We found that VBHC can indeed improve patient care and may contribute in establishing a standardized and optimized procedure in the diagnostic processes.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S5)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Central Institute of Mental Health (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.