Potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with cognitive impairment and dementia attending primary care‐based memory clinics

Abstract Background The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults with dementia and/or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has been associated with increased adverse events, drug‐related problems (DRPs), prolonged hospitalization, risk of falls, and increased length of stay. This study aimed to identify which explicit tool, Beers criteria 2023 or Screening Tool of Older Persons Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) 2023, identifies more PIM use among older adults with MCI or dementia. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted at a Multispecialty Interprofessional Team‐based (MINT) memory clinic. Patients with MCI or dementia were recruited between Jan and August 2023. Patient medical records were reviewed for PIMs using Beers Criteria 2023 and STOPP criteria 2023. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify potential factors associated with the use of PIMs. Results Overall, 44 participants were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 80.2± 6.2 years. Among 44 patients, 36.4% (n = 16) patients had MCI, followed by one‐fifth of patients (n = 9) who had mixed dementia and 11.4% (n = 5) with vascular cognitive impairment. At least one PIM was identified in 47.7% (n = 21) and 27.2% (n = 12) of the study participants based on Beers' and STOPP’s criteria, respectively. Using the Beers criteria, 50 PIMs were found, with an average of 0.9 PIMs for each patient, while a total of 31 PIMs were identified using the STOPP criteria, with an average of 0.6 PIMs per patient. There was a significant association between ≥ 9 number of comorbidities and PIMs as per Beers criteria (OR = 8.4, 95% Confidence interval: 1.27‐ 55.39, P = 0.027). However, no statistically significant association was observed with PIMs as per STOPP criteria. Conclusion The frequency of PIMs identified using Beers and STOPP criteria highlights the importance of identifying and addressing PIMs in this population. This study adds valuable insights to the progressing comprehension of medication‐related complexities in older adults living with MCI or dementia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086936
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with cognitive impairment and dementia attending primary care‐based memory clinics

Tejal Patel, Feng Chang, Rishabh Sharma, Linda Lee
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
0.34
article

Potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults with cognitive impairment and dementia attending primary care‐based memory clinics

Tejal Patel, Feng Chang, Rishabh Sharma, Linda Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults with dementia and/or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has been associated with increased adverse events, drug‐related problems (DRPs), prolonged hospitalization, risk of falls, and increased length of stay. This study aimed to identify which explicit tool, Beers criteria 2023 or Screening Tool of Older Persons Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) 2023, identifies more PIM use among older adults with MCI or dementia. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted at a Multispecialty Interprofessional Team‐based (MINT) memory clinic. Patients with MCI or dementia were recruited between Jan and August 2023. Patient medical records were reviewed for PIMs using Beers Criteria 2023 and STOPP criteria 2023. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify potential factors associated with the use of PIMs. Results Overall, 44 participants were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 80.2± 6.2 years. Among 44 patients, 36.4% (n = 16) patients had MCI, followed by one‐fifth of patients (n = 9) who had mixed dementia and 11.4% (n = 5) with vascular cognitive impairment. At least one PIM was identified in 47.7% (n = 21) and 27.2% (n = 12) of the study participants based on Beers' and STOPP’s criteria, respectively. Using the Beers criteria, 50 PIMs were found, with an average of 0.9 PIMs for each patient, while a total of 31 PIMs were identified using the STOPP criteria, with an average of 0.6 PIMs per patient. There was a significant association between ≥ 9 number of comorbidities and PIMs as per Beers criteria (OR = 8.4, 95% Confidence interval: 1.27‐ 55.39, P = 0.027). However, no statistically significant association was observed with PIMs as per STOPP criteria. Conclusion The frequency of PIMs identified using Beers and STOPP criteria highlights the importance of identifying and addressing PIMs in this population. This study adds valuable insights to the progressing comprehension of medication‐related complexities in older adults living with MCI or dementia.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S5)
University of Waterloo (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.