Analyzing Mobility Gaps Between People with and without Disabilities using Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Method

Some population groups have lower propensity to be mobile than others. The reasons for this divergence in tendencies are difficult to assess namely since some of these groups have vulnerability features and are typically less observed and analyzed in regular surveys. The aim of this research is to compare the mobility of people with and without disabilities. Data from the 2019 Origin-Destination survey for Montreal City (Canada) allows to calculate four mobility indicators. 54% of the people with disabilities are immobile during a typical weekday compared to 17% for the other group. To understand the source of the mobility gap, two estimations with Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method are used. It has been found that a portion of this gap is explained by different characteristics of the two groups (proportion of older adults, workers, and people with driver license). The gap is also explained by disparities between people with similar characteristics. Women and older adults with disabilities are less mobile than women and older adults without disabilities. The analysis of people with and without disabilities satisfaction suggests that the perception of PT is a factor associated with the mobility gap between the two groups, but further research will be necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation research procedia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2024.12.223
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Mobility Gaps Between People with and without Disabilities using Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Method

Martin Trépanier, Camille Garnier, Catherine Morency
Transportation research procedia
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Analyzing Mobility Gaps Between People with and without Disabilities using Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition Method

Martin Trépanier, Camille Garnier, Catherine Morency
article en

Abstract

Some population groups have lower propensity to be mobile than others. The reasons for this divergence in tendencies are difficult to assess namely since some of these groups have vulnerability features and are typically less observed and analyzed in regular surveys. The aim of this research is to compare the mobility of people with and without disabilities. Data from the 2019 Origin-Destination survey for Montreal City (Canada) allows to calculate four mobility indicators. 54% of the people with disabilities are immobile during a typical weekday compared to 17% for the other group. To understand the source of the mobility gap, two estimations with Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method are used. It has been found that a portion of this gap is explained by different characteristics of the two groups (proportion of older adults, workers, and people with driver license). The gap is also explained by disparities between people with similar characteristics. Women and older adults with disabilities are less mobile than women and older adults without disabilities. The analysis of people with and without disabilities satisfaction suggests that the perception of PT is a factor associated with the mobility gap between the two groups, but further research will be necessary.

Transportation research procediaVol. 82
Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Polytechnique Montréal
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.