Evaluation of external and radiological landmark methods for optimizing ultrasound-guided right internal jugular venous catheterization depth in cardiac surgery

The formula-based estimation of the right internal jugular venous (IJV) catheterization depth can be inaccurate when using ultrasound guidance. External landmark-based and radiological landmark-based methods have been proposed as alternatives to estimate the insertion depth. This study aimed to evaluate these methods using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided insertion depth as the reference. Ninety-seven adult cardiac surgery patients underwent real-time ultrasound-guided right IJV catheterization, with placement at the superior vena cava-right atrium (SVC-RA) junction under TEE guidance. The primary outcome compared the accuracy of external-landmark and radiological-landmark methods in estimating optimal catheter position (2 cm above to 1 cm below the SVC-RA junction), while secondary outcomes assessed their reliability and agreement with TEE. The external-landmark method proved more accurate than the radiological-landmark method (91.8% vs. 68%, p < 0.001) and had a higher correlation with TEE (r = 0.83 vs. 0.67). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.08 cm between external-landmark and TEE methods (limits of agreement: -1.75 to 1.90 cm) and 0.43 cm for radiological-landmark (limits of agreement: -2.63 to 3.49 cm). Overall, the external-landmark method is a reliable and simple technique for estimating right IJV catheter depth and is more useful in cardiac surgery compared to the radiological-landmark method.Trial registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20200410012). Date registered April 9, 2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85906-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of external and radiological landmark methods for optimizing ultrasound-guided right internal jugular venous catheterization depth in cardiac surgery

Nutchanart Bunchungmongkol, Lalita Huntrakul, Settapong Boonsri, Tanyong Pipanmekaporn et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
article

Evaluation of external and radiological landmark methods for optimizing ultrasound-guided right internal jugular venous catheterization depth in cardiac surgery

Nutchanart Bunchungmongkol, Lalita Huntrakul, Settapong Boonsri, Tanyong Pipanmekaporn, Wariya Sukhupragarn, Panuwat Lapisatepun, Artid Samerchua, Pattaranee Srichairatanakool
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The formula-based estimation of the right internal jugular venous (IJV) catheterization depth can be inaccurate when using ultrasound guidance. External landmark-based and radiological landmark-based methods have been proposed as alternatives to estimate the insertion depth. This study aimed to evaluate these methods using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided insertion depth as the reference. Ninety-seven adult cardiac surgery patients underwent real-time ultrasound-guided right IJV catheterization, with placement at the superior vena cava-right atrium (SVC-RA) junction under TEE guidance. The primary outcome compared the accuracy of external-landmark and radiological-landmark methods in estimating optimal catheter position (2 cm above to 1 cm below the SVC-RA junction), while secondary outcomes assessed their reliability and agreement with TEE. The external-landmark method proved more accurate than the radiological-landmark method (91.8% vs. 68%, p < 0.001) and had a higher correlation with TEE (r = 0.83 vs. 0.67). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.08 cm between external-landmark and TEE methods (limits of agreement: -1.75 to 1.90 cm) and 0.43 cm for radiological-landmark (limits of agreement: -2.63 to 3.49 cm). Overall, the external-landmark method is a reliable and simple technique for estimating right IJV catheter depth and is more useful in cardiac surgery compared to the radiological-landmark method.Trial registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20200410012). Date registered April 9, 2020.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Chiang Mai University (TH)
Chiang Mai University, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.