Trust during troubled times: Evidence from Sierra Leone's Ebola epidemic

Existing literature provides evidence that crises can considerably impact public trust. However, research on these dynamics in lower-income and postconflict countries like Sierra Leone is limited. Using nationally representative survey data and district-level Ebola infection data, herein, we examine the relationship between the Ebola epidemic and various measures of government trust. Our analysis, which employs propensity score matching and other techniques, reveals a notable decline in trust among individuals exposed to the outbreak. Our estimates indicate that individual perceptions of trust in government and other government entities decreased by 11.6%–33.6% following the Ebola epidemic. This relationship is driven by factors such as perceived poor performance in epidemic response management and healthcare service provision. These findings contribute to our understanding of the intricate correlation between these variables and the importance of taking proactive measures to mitigate the detrimental effects of epidemics on government–citizen relations. • We study the impact on trust in government during the Ebola epidemic. • An erosion of trust in government exists after the Ebola epidemic. • Inefficient health services and corruption are underlying mechanisms. • Policies to improve healthcare and transparency postepidemic are suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Modelling
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2024.107004
Citations
4
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust during troubled times: Evidence from Sierra Leone's Ebola epidemic

Colin Cannonier, Monica Galloway Burke
4 citations
Economic Modelling
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
5.47
article

Trust during troubled times: Evidence from Sierra Leone's Ebola epidemic

Colin Cannonier, Monica Galloway Burke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Existing literature provides evidence that crises can considerably impact public trust. However, research on these dynamics in lower-income and postconflict countries like Sierra Leone is limited. Using nationally representative survey data and district-level Ebola infection data, herein, we examine the relationship between the Ebola epidemic and various measures of government trust. Our analysis, which employs propensity score matching and other techniques, reveals a notable decline in trust among individuals exposed to the outbreak. Our estimates indicate that individual perceptions of trust in government and other government entities decreased by 11.6%–33.6% following the Ebola epidemic. This relationship is driven by factors such as perceived poor performance in epidemic response management and healthcare service provision. These findings contribute to our understanding of the intricate correlation between these variables and the importance of taking proactive measures to mitigate the detrimental effects of epidemics on government–citizen relations. • We study the impact on trust in government during the Ebola epidemic. • An erosion of trust in government exists after the Ebola epidemic. • Inefficient health services and corruption are underlying mechanisms. • Policies to improve healthcare and transparency postepidemic are suggested.

Economic ModellingVol. 144
Belmont University (US), Western Kentucky University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
5.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.