A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks

Abstract The accurate prediction of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) in rock samples is critical for the successful planning, design, and implementation of mining and civil engineering projects. UCS is crucial in assessing the stability and durability of rock masses, which directly influences the safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of construction and excavation operations. Here’s a refined version of your text for enhanced clarity and flow: in this part, the execution of the proposed model was compared for both single and hybrid configurations. Hybrid models included support vector regression (SVR) combined with the Seahorse Optimizer (SVSH) and SVR combined with the COOT optimization algorithm (SVCO). For training, 70% of the UCS dataset was utilized, while the remaining 30% was equally divided between testing (15%) and validation (15%). For the model evaluation, several metrics were considered in this work, including the R 2 , RMSE, WAPE, MAE, and RAE, which ensure fairness in the analysis. The closer the R 2 value comes to 1, the better the performance. The error metrics should be close to 0 for better accuracy. From Table 2, one can observe that the result of the standalone SVR model gave an RMSE of 6.213 during training and 9.454 during testing, hence showing poor performance. However, the inclusion of optimization algorithms significantly improved the performance of the SVR framework. Among the hybrid models, the SVSH model had the best performance, with an R 2 value of 0.998 and an RMSE of 1.261 during training. The SVCO model performed moderately, with an R 2 value of 0.988 during training.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00574-9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks

Wei Cao
3 citations
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Drilling and Well Engineering
3.44
article

A comparative study of hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to predict the unconfined compressive strength of rocks

Wei Cao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The accurate prediction of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) in rock samples is critical for the successful planning, design, and implementation of mining and civil engineering projects. UCS is crucial in assessing the stability and durability of rock masses, which directly influences the safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of construction and excavation operations. Here’s a refined version of your text for enhanced clarity and flow: in this part, the execution of the proposed model was compared for both single and hybrid configurations. Hybrid models included support vector regression (SVR) combined with the Seahorse Optimizer (SVSH) and SVR combined with the COOT optimization algorithm (SVCO). For training, 70% of the UCS dataset was utilized, while the remaining 30% was equally divided between testing (15%) and validation (15%). For the model evaluation, several metrics were considered in this work, including the R 2 , RMSE, WAPE, MAE, and RAE, which ensure fairness in the analysis. The closer the R 2 value comes to 1, the better the performance. The error metrics should be close to 0 for better accuracy. From Table 2, one can observe that the result of the standalone SVR model gave an RMSE of 6.213 during training and 9.454 during testing, hence showing poor performance. However, the inclusion of optimization algorithms significantly improved the performance of the SVR framework. Among the hybrid models, the SVSH model had the best performance, with an R 2 value of 0.998 and an RMSE of 1.261 during training. The SVCO model performed moderately, with an R 2 value of 0.988 during training.

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 72(1)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Drilling and Well Engineering
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.