PRISMA-7 (for frailty assessment) and SARC-F (for evaluation of sarcopenia risk) in predicting emergency department readmission and mortality

Background: Frailty scores can predict hospitalization and other related adversities. The frailty status determination is thus useful in clinical decisions regarding elderly patients. This study was aimed to evaluate the potential of PRISMA-7 (Program on Research for Integrating Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7 item question-naire) and SARC-F (A Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia) scores in predicting hospitalization following the emergency department (ED) admission, readmission at 1, 3 and 6 months, and mortality within 6-month follow-up period. Methods: A total of 150 patients of over 65 years age and presented to the ED in 6-month period were included in this prospective study. The patients’ SARC-F and PRISMA-7 scores were calculated at the first presentation to ED. Later, the same patients were evaluated via the electronic hospital system and called by phone. Their status was evaluated regarding the recurrent ED visits, hospitalization and mortality at 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: At the time of presentation, 72% patients had sarcopenia risk according to SARC-F score and 68.7% had frailty risk as per the PRISMA-7 score. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis exhibited the relationship between long-term mortality and PRISMA-7 and SARC-F scores. The best cut-off value of PRISMA-7 for predicting 6-month mortality was >3 in this study group. The best cut-off for long-term mortality was >7 in the ROC analysis of SARC-F score. Conclusions: PRISMA-7 and SARC-F were applicable at the initial presentation to ED as well as at the follow-up. Towards the end of study, positivity of single questionnaire predicted the readmission to ED, especially in the 1st month follow-up, while the positivity of both questionnaires predicted mortality in all the follow-ups. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06525038.

Publication Details

Journal
Signa Vitae
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2025.012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRISMA-7 (for frailty assessment) and SARC-F (for evaluation of sarcopenia risk) in predicting emergency department readmission and mortality

2 citations
Signa Vitae
Nutrition and Health in Aging
2.33
article

PRISMA-7 (for frailty assessment) and SARC-F (for evaluation of sarcopenia risk) in predicting emergency department readmission and mortality

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background: Frailty scores can predict hospitalization and other related adversities. The frailty status determination is thus useful in clinical decisions regarding elderly patients. This study was aimed to evaluate the potential of PRISMA-7 (Program on Research for Integrating Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy 7 item question-naire) and SARC-F (A Simple Questionnaire to Rapidly Diagnose Sarcopenia) scores in predicting hospitalization following the emergency department (ED) admission, readmission at 1, 3 and 6 months, and mortality within 6-month follow-up period. Methods: A total of 150 patients of over 65 years age and presented to the ED in 6-month period were included in this prospective study. The patients’ SARC-F and PRISMA-7 scores were calculated at the first presentation to ED. Later, the same patients were evaluated via the electronic hospital system and called by phone. Their status was evaluated regarding the recurrent ED visits, hospitalization and mortality at 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: At the time of presentation, 72% patients had sarcopenia risk according to SARC-F score and 68.7% had frailty risk as per the PRISMA-7 score. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis exhibited the relationship between long-term mortality and PRISMA-7 and SARC-F scores. The best cut-off value of PRISMA-7 for predicting 6-month mortality was >3 in this study group. The best cut-off for long-term mortality was >7 in the ROC analysis of SARC-F score. Conclusions: PRISMA-7 and SARC-F were applicable at the initial presentation to ED as well as at the follow-up. Towards the end of study, positivity of single questionnaire predicted the readmission to ED, especially in the 1st month follow-up, while the positivity of both questionnaires predicted mortality in all the follow-ups. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06525038.

Signa VitaeVol. 21(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.