Qualitative review of group decision-making in transplant selection committees

S77Poster Sessions in the time period after the policy change: 1.5x10 6 miles for all lung transplants, 3.1x10 6 for all heart transplants, 2.2x10 6 miles for all liver transplants, and 3.2x10 6 miles for all kidney transplants, for a total of 1.0x10 7 .This led to increased carbon emissions for each organ: 3.1x10 6 kg CO2e for lung (Range: 3.063-3.094x10 6) (50% increase), 6.2x10 6 kg CO2e for heart (Range: 6.179-6.228x10 6) (96% increase), 4.4x10 6 for liver (Range: 4.176-4.488x10 6) (41% increase), 2.3x10 5 kg CO2e for kidney (Range: 1.605-4.264x10 5) (36% increase), for a total of 1.4x10 7 kg CO2e (Range:1.384-1.397x107 ) (58% increase).This data suggests that there was an increase in total distance traveled with a resulting increase in carbon emissions for each organ analyzed.This issue should be considered as the OPTN pursues Continuous Distribution.Carbon emissions from kidney transplants were relatively small because of the higher usage of commercial air transport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Transplantation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.12.151
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative review of group decision-making in transplant selection committees

Tayyab S. Diwan, Frank Lee, Lindsay R. Beaman, Christopher Kim et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Transplantation
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
article

Qualitative review of group decision-making in transplant selection committees

Tayyab S. Diwan, Frank Lee, Lindsay R. Beaman, Christopher Kim, Leigh Meyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

S77Poster Sessions in the time period after the policy change: 1.5x10 6 miles for all lung transplants, 3.1x10 6 for all heart transplants, 2.2x10 6 miles for all liver transplants, and 3.2x10 6 miles for all kidney transplants, for a total of 1.0x10 7 .This led to increased carbon emissions for each organ: 3.1x10 6 kg CO2e for lung (Range: 3.063-3.094x10 6) (50% increase), 6.2x10 6 kg CO2e for heart (Range: 6.179-6.228x10 6) (96% increase), 4.4x10 6 for liver (Range: 4.176-4.488x10 6) (41% increase), 2.3x10 5 kg CO2e for kidney (Range: 1.605-4.264x10 5) (36% increase), for a total of 1.4x10 7 kg CO2e (Range:1.384-1.397x107 ) (58% increase).This data suggests that there was an increase in total distance traveled with a resulting increase in carbon emissions for each organ analyzed.This issue should be considered as the OPTN pursues Continuous Distribution.Carbon emissions from kidney transplants were relatively small because of the higher usage of commercial air transport.

American Journal of TransplantationVol. 25(1)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ethics in medical practice
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Qualitative review of group decision-making in transplant selection committees — Tayyab S. Diwan, Frank Lee, et al. · American Journal of Transplantation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS