Religious FatwÄ and Human Security: Managing Public Health through the Lens of Islamic Jurisprudence in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia

This study examines the authorisation of religion in handling COVID-19 through religious fatwā issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council, popularly known as the Majelis Ulama’ Indonesia (MUI), and the Council of Senior Scholars of Saudi Arabia (CSS). The objectives of this study are threefold: firstly, to analyse the methodological formulation of MUI and CSS fatwā regarding COVID-19 handling; secondly, to identify the factors underlying the issuance of these fatwā; and thirdly, to assess the impact of MUI and CSS fatwā on COVID-19 handling. Using a qualitative descriptive research method and conducting a case study of the MUI and CSS fatwā institutions, it was found that the methodological basis of the MUI and CSS fatwā on COVID-19 includes sources from the Qur’an, hadith, ijmā’ (consensus), and qiyas (analogy), as well as maqāṣīd sharī’ah. Referring to maqāṣīd sharī’ah considerations, two priority dimensions emerge as factors in the issuance of MUI and CSS fatwā: ḥifẓ al-dīn (preservation of religion) and ḥifẓ al-nafs (preservation of life). This study also highlights the significant impact of MUI and CSS fatwā on COVID-19 handling. In this context, fatwā play a role as part of prevention strategies due to their strong theological influence and effective enforcement of policy implementation. This fatwā is especially pertinent given the roles of MUI and CSS, which, from the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, have contributed to supporting government policies through the fatwā they issued. However, differences exist. MUI fatwā tend to be recommendations and appeals, often disregarded by the public as they lack legal sanctions for non-compliance. However, fatwā issued by CSS possess absolute authority. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how religious authorization can support public health policies during a pandemic. Additionally, it offers insights for enhancing the effectiveness of fatwā in the context of future health crises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Khazanah Hukum
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v6i3.40478
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religious FatwÄ and Human Security: Managing Public Health through the Lens of Islamic Jurisprudence in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia

Khairul Hamim, Lalu Supriadi Bin Mujib, Ahmad Muhasim
1 citations
Khazanah Hukum
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
1.13
article

Religious FatwÄ and Human Security: Managing Public Health through the Lens of Islamic Jurisprudence in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia

Khairul Hamim, Lalu Supriadi Bin Mujib, Ahmad Muhasim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the authorisation of religion in handling COVID-19 through religious fatwā issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council, popularly known as the Majelis Ulama’ Indonesia (MUI), and the Council of Senior Scholars of Saudi Arabia (CSS). The objectives of this study are threefold: firstly, to analyse the methodological formulation of MUI and CSS fatwā regarding COVID-19 handling; secondly, to identify the factors underlying the issuance of these fatwā; and thirdly, to assess the impact of MUI and CSS fatwā on COVID-19 handling. Using a qualitative descriptive research method and conducting a case study of the MUI and CSS fatwā institutions, it was found that the methodological basis of the MUI and CSS fatwā on COVID-19 includes sources from the Qur’an, hadith, ijmā’ (consensus), and qiyas (analogy), as well as maqāṣīd sharī’ah. Referring to maqāṣīd sharī’ah considerations, two priority dimensions emerge as factors in the issuance of MUI and CSS fatwā: ḥifẓ al-dīn (preservation of religion) and ḥifẓ al-nafs (preservation of life). This study also highlights the significant impact of MUI and CSS fatwā on COVID-19 handling. In this context, fatwā play a role as part of prevention strategies due to their strong theological influence and effective enforcement of policy implementation. This fatwā is especially pertinent given the roles of MUI and CSS, which, from the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, have contributed to supporting government policies through the fatwā they issued. However, differences exist. MUI fatwā tend to be recommendations and appeals, often disregarded by the public as they lack legal sanctions for non-compliance. However, fatwā issued by CSS possess absolute authority. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of how religious authorization can support public health policies during a pandemic. Additionally, it offers insights for enhancing the effectiveness of fatwā in the context of future health crises.

Khazanah HukumVol. 6(3)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Religious FatwÄ and Human Security: Managing Public Health through the Lens of Islamic Jurisprudence in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia — Khairul Hamim, Lalu Supriadi Bin Mujib, et al. · Khazanah Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS