Counter‐Example to Diaby’s et al. Linear Programming Solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem

This article presents a method of constructing counter‐examples and a complete counter‐example to the linear programming model alleged to be the solution to the traveling salesman problem. The counter‐example is checked against the model proposed by Diaby et al. However, it applies to all similar formulations of the TSP problem. Although the model in question was published in 2006, and there were several discussions regarding its correctness, the counter‐example was never presented. The presented counter‐example is a regular graph, and the aim was not to have an example with the least possible size; therefore, the focus was on clarity. The counter‐example has, therefore, 366 nodes in two main clusters, each node (in the main part) having exactly four connections to other nodes in the cluster.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Complexity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/cplx/3672180
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counter‐Example to Diaby’s et al. Linear Programming Solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem

Radosław Hofman
Complexity
Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
article

Counter‐Example to Diaby’s et al. Linear Programming Solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem

Radosław Hofman
article en

Abstract

This article presents a method of constructing counter‐examples and a complete counter‐example to the linear programming model alleged to be the solution to the traveling salesman problem. The counter‐example is checked against the model proposed by Diaby et al. However, it applies to all similar formulations of the TSP problem. Although the model in question was published in 2006, and there were several discussions regarding its correctness, the counter‐example was never presented. The presented counter‐example is a regular graph, and the aim was not to have an example with the least possible size; therefore, the focus was on clarity. The counter‐example has, therefore, 366 nodes in two main clusters, each node (in the main part) having exactly four connections to other nodes in the cluster.

ComplexityVol. 2025(1)
Oldham Council (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.