Privileges in Printmaking

The Low Countries became a centre of printmaking in the early modern period. Printmaking was a disruptive image-technology because it produced images as multiples on an unprecedented scale. With its success also came problems. One was that copying became a problem as it had not been before in the visual arts. This article discusses three approaches used by early modern printmakers to dealing with the problems presented by copying and the fact that prints came in multiples. The first was to acquire privileges as legal protection against copying. Privileges are usually seen as the predecessors of copyright, but here it is argued that this is only part of the story and that they also served as a claim of reliability. A second approach was to take full advantage of the opportunities presented by the fact that prints came in multiples, and to produce images as efficiently as possible, in effect endlessly copying the same images. A third approach was to purposefully ignore the technological possibilities of printmaking and instead produce small print runs or slightly different states of one image. These approaches, it is argued, were related both to technological possibilities and to changing ideas about the (visual) arts, showing how the meanings of concepts such as ‘invention’ and ‘skill’ were shifting at this time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Modern Low Countries
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51750/emlc20823
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privileges in Printmaking

Marlise Rijks
Early Modern Low Countries
Intellectual Property Law
article

Privileges in Printmaking

Marlise Rijks
article en

Abstract

The Low Countries became a centre of printmaking in the early modern period. Printmaking was a disruptive image-technology because it produced images as multiples on an unprecedented scale. With its success also came problems. One was that copying became a problem as it had not been before in the visual arts. This article discusses three approaches used by early modern printmakers to dealing with the problems presented by copying and the fact that prints came in multiples. The first was to acquire privileges as legal protection against copying. Privileges are usually seen as the predecessors of copyright, but here it is argued that this is only part of the story and that they also served as a claim of reliability. A second approach was to take full advantage of the opportunities presented by the fact that prints came in multiples, and to produce images as efficiently as possible, in effect endlessly copying the same images. A third approach was to purposefully ignore the technological possibilities of printmaking and instead produce small print runs or slightly different states of one image. These approaches, it is argued, were related both to technological possibilities and to changing ideas about the (visual) arts, showing how the meanings of concepts such as ‘invention’ and ‘skill’ were shifting at this time.

Early Modern Low CountriesVol. 8(2)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
European Commission, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.