Microbes as Machines: Life, Control, and the Problem of Scale in the Emergence of Nanotechnology

ABSTRACT: This article re-examines claims made around nanotechnology early in its conception in order to retrospectively highlight questions at the core of that discourse that remain relevant today. Early nanotechnology rhetoric paradoxically invokes the capacities of microbes as proof of concept, even as nanoscientists dream of creating far more complex modes of building and intervention at the nanoscale. This article traces this contradictory trope through the history of nanotechnology, including a reading of Drexler’s Engines of Creation , Feynman’s “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” the Drexler–Smalley debate, and the idea of “self-assembly.” I demonstrate how microbial capacities bring into view but also cover over questions about the nature of technological control, how we define life, and what is possible at the nanoscale. Throughout, the dreams of precise control at the nanoscale are contrasted to an alternative vision presented by Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan that also situates microbes as technological but does so to present a vision that reworks or even displaces human control.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Configurations
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2025.a948958
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbes as Machines: Life, Control, and the Problem of Scale in the Emergence of Nanotechnology

Joshua DiCaglio
Configurations
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

Microbes as Machines: Life, Control, and the Problem of Scale in the Emergence of Nanotechnology

Joshua DiCaglio
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This article re-examines claims made around nanotechnology early in its conception in order to retrospectively highlight questions at the core of that discourse that remain relevant today. Early nanotechnology rhetoric paradoxically invokes the capacities of microbes as proof of concept, even as nanoscientists dream of creating far more complex modes of building and intervention at the nanoscale. This article traces this contradictory trope through the history of nanotechnology, including a reading of Drexler’s Engines of Creation , Feynman’s “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom,” the Drexler–Smalley debate, and the idea of “self-assembly.” I demonstrate how microbial capacities bring into view but also cover over questions about the nature of technological control, how we define life, and what is possible at the nanoscale. Throughout, the dreams of precise control at the nanoscale are contrasted to an alternative vision presented by Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan that also situates microbes as technological but does so to present a vision that reworks or even displaces human control.

ConfigurationsVol. 33(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.