Study on Antimonopoly Law Regulation of E-Commerce Platform’s “Either-Or Choice” Behaviour

“二选一”是指电商平台利用其优势地位,要求平台上的经营者不得在其他平台上经营的行为。“二选一”一定程度上侵害了其他电商平台和平台上经营者的合法权益,也损害了广大消费者的公平选择权和自主交易权,有必要予以规制。当前,我国法律在规制“二选一”行为时均展现出一定的局限性,导致不能有效规制“二选一”行为。因此,应采取有效措施解决这一问题,具体而言,应将《反垄断法》作为规制“二选一”行为的核心规范,并对其进行完善,如明确正当理由的认定标准,引入滥用相对优势地位条款,完善平台监管体系。“Either-Or Choice” refers to the behaviour of an e-commerce platform that takes advantage of its dominant position to require operators on the platform not to operate on other platforms. To a certain extent, “Either-Or Choice” infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of other e-commerce platforms and operators on the platform, and also damages the consumers’ right to fair choice and right to independent transactions, and it is necessary to regulate it. At present, China’s laws show certain limitations in regulating the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour, resulting in the failure to effectively regulate the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour. Therefore, effective measures should be taken to solve this problem. Specifically, the Anti-Monopoly Law should be taken as the core norms to regulate the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour and be improved, such as clarifying the criteria for the determination of justifiable reasons, introducing the clause of abuse of comparative advantage, and perfecting the platform supervision system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
E-Commerce Letters
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2025.141087
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on Antimonopoly Law Regulation of E-Commerce Platform’s “Either-Or Choice” Behaviour

海云 王
1 citations
E-Commerce Letters
Regional Development and Environment
4.20
article

Study on Antimonopoly Law Regulation of E-Commerce Platform’s “Either-Or Choice” Behaviour

海云 王
article en
1 citations

Abstract

“二选一”是指电商平台利用其优势地位,要求平台上的经营者不得在其他平台上经营的行为。“二选一”一定程度上侵害了其他电商平台和平台上经营者的合法权益,也损害了广大消费者的公平选择权和自主交易权,有必要予以规制。当前,我国法律在规制“二选一”行为时均展现出一定的局限性,导致不能有效规制“二选一”行为。因此,应采取有效措施解决这一问题,具体而言,应将《反垄断法》作为规制“二选一”行为的核心规范,并对其进行完善,如明确正当理由的认定标准,引入滥用相对优势地位条款,完善平台监管体系。“Either-Or Choice” refers to the behaviour of an e-commerce platform that takes advantage of its dominant position to require operators on the platform not to operate on other platforms. To a certain extent, “Either-Or Choice” infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of other e-commerce platforms and operators on the platform, and also damages the consumers’ right to fair choice and right to independent transactions, and it is necessary to regulate it. At present, China’s laws show certain limitations in regulating the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour, resulting in the failure to effectively regulate the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour. Therefore, effective measures should be taken to solve this problem. Specifically, the Anti-Monopoly Law should be taken as the core norms to regulate the “Either-Or Choice” behaviour and be improved, such as clarifying the criteria for the determination of justifiable reasons, introducing the clause of abuse of comparative advantage, and perfecting the platform supervision system.

E-Commerce LettersVol. 14(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Regional Development and Environment
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Study on Antimonopoly Law Regulation of E-Commerce Platform’s “Either-Or Choice” Behaviour — 海云 王 · E-Commerce Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS