Squeezing the hosting capacity: what is the value of active power curtailment?

The planning option of active power curtailment in electrical distribution grids intends to quickly integrate renewable energy sources into the grid, manage grid reinforcement and expansion, and prioritize planning measures. In Germany, a curtailment of 3 % of the annual production of photovoltaic plants and onshore wind power plants is allowed in the planning. Adequately representing these 3 % in grid planning is a challenge that has been addressed in several studies. There are a few caveats regarding the consideration of operational expenditures. On the one hand, the inconsistency between the “compliance with the 3 % criterion” in grid planning and operation makes it obsolete to derive the “real curtailed energy” (grid operation) within the planning process. On the other hand, there is a lack of dependable price assumptions for the reimbursement of the curtailed energy. In this paper, we show how different assumptions for the criterion compliance and the curtailment price change the economic effect of curtailment. To this end, we propose a framework for the assessment of criterion compliance and conduct a case study on a German MV grid model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.1998
Primary Topic
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Squeezing the hosting capacity: what is the value of active power curtailment?

Friederike Wenderoth, Jan Wiemer, Martin Braun
IET conference proceedings.
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
article

Squeezing the hosting capacity: what is the value of active power curtailment?

Friederike Wenderoth, Jan Wiemer, Martin Braun
article en

Abstract

The planning option of active power curtailment in electrical distribution grids intends to quickly integrate renewable energy sources into the grid, manage grid reinforcement and expansion, and prioritize planning measures. In Germany, a curtailment of 3 % of the annual production of photovoltaic plants and onshore wind power plants is allowed in the planning. Adequately representing these 3 % in grid planning is a challenge that has been addressed in several studies. There are a few caveats regarding the consideration of operational expenditures. On the one hand, the inconsistency between the “compliance with the 3 % criterion” in grid planning and operation makes it obsolete to derive the “real curtailed energy” (grid operation) within the planning process. On the other hand, there is a lack of dependable price assumptions for the reimbursement of the curtailed energy. In this paper, we show how different assumptions for the criterion compliance and the curtailment price change the economic effect of curtailment. To this end, we propose a framework for the assessment of criterion compliance and conduct a case study on a German MV grid model.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2024(5)
University of Kassel (DE), Deutsche Energy Agency (Germany) (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Power System Reliability and Maintenance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.