Rural Financial Landscape in Bangladesh: Who is More Convenient for Rural Enterprises—Banks or Microfinance Institutions?

This article presents a comparative position of banks and microfinance institutions (MFIs) in reaching rural enterprises in Bangladesh, particularly in lending and savings services. We have gathered data from 225 respondents through a questionnaire survey on the demand side of the rural market of Bangladesh. The rural financial market is still mostly informal and underserved. MFIs have reached nearer physically and through the lending methodology to rural enterprises despite capability constraints in fund arrangement having organisational limitations to expand as per demand. On the other hand, conventional banks are not as near as MFIs are, particularly in remote rural areas. The attitude of bank officials, including the culture developed within the organisation, is a major barrier for rural enterprises to access credit and other desired financial services. However, people expect more from banks than MFIs despite the persistent reluctance of banks to be nearer. In both cases, products are imperfectly designed to cater to a wide range of rural people and their enterprises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10185291241307279
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural Financial Landscape in Bangladesh: Who is More Convenient for Rural Enterprises—Banks or Microfinance Institutions?

Antoni F. Tulla i Pujol, Azim Uddin Mahmud
1 citations
Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
1.13
article

Rural Financial Landscape in Bangladesh: Who is More Convenient for Rural Enterprises—Banks or Microfinance Institutions?

Antoni F. Tulla i Pujol, Azim Uddin Mahmud
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article presents a comparative position of banks and microfinance institutions (MFIs) in reaching rural enterprises in Bangladesh, particularly in lending and savings services. We have gathered data from 225 respondents through a questionnaire survey on the demand side of the rural market of Bangladesh. The rural financial market is still mostly informal and underserved. MFIs have reached nearer physically and through the lending methodology to rural enterprises despite capability constraints in fund arrangement having organisational limitations to expand as per demand. On the other hand, conventional banks are not as near as MFIs are, particularly in remote rural areas. The attitude of bank officials, including the culture developed within the organisation, is a major barrier for rural enterprises to access credit and other desired financial services. However, people expect more from banks than MFIs despite the persistent reluctance of banks to be nearer. In both cases, products are imperfectly designed to cater to a wide range of rural people and their enterprises.

Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural DevelopmentVol. 34(2)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.