A novel water-food-energy framework for a comprehensive assessment of resource recovery from wastewater treatment plants

There is a trend towards decentralized source separation (DSS) for wastewater treatment and resource recovery. An assessment framework is required to assess whether implementing a DSS treatment over a conventional centralized one is advantageous. This framework needs to account for the performance of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and the effect that resource recovery has on closely linked sectors such as food and energy production. A framework is lacking that covers the economic dimension, the circularity, the nature of reciprocity of resource recovery and can be applied to real-life cases. A novel WFE framework has been developed here to compare a conventional centralized and a DSS-based WWTP. This novel WFE framework contains assessment methods that are reproducible, and applicable to real-life cases. It also accounts for the local climatic conditions that determine irrigation water requirements. The comparison results revealed that the need to construct new DSS infrastructure leads to a lower economic efficiency of water treatment. Further, chemical-intensive treatment reduces the DSS's material resource circularity and efficiency. Using heat pumps increases the energy use of the DSS WWTP, causing a reduction in water treatment energy efficiency. However, the advantages of DSS show up in the freshwater and nutrient efficiency of food production as well as in the energy self-sufficiency of the WWTP. The novel WFE framework contains indicators specific to water treatment and the food production sectors to improve inter-sectoral communication. Also, including the nature reciprocity assessment can help demonstrate the issue with treated wastewater discharge, especially in arid regions with low stream flows. It can potentially help improve the acceptance of treated wastewater-based reuse. To conclude, the novel framework helps to assess real-life case studies in a more integrated and holistic way. It can help make decisions related to decentralization and source separation by simultaneously considering the water treatment, energy production, and food production sectors. • DSS with heat pumps can lead to energy positive wastewater treatment. • Source separation deserves precedence over decentralization. • Chemical-intensive treatment processes lead to low material efficiency. • The greatest advantage of DSS is a higher food production energy efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144716
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel water-food-energy framework for a comprehensive assessment of resource recovery from wastewater treatment plants

Jan Peter van der Hoek, Oriana Jovanović, Hamse Kjerstadius, Giorgio Mannina et al.
2 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
1.63
article

A novel water-food-energy framework for a comprehensive assessment of resource recovery from wastewater treatment plants

Jan Peter van der Hoek, Oriana Jovanović, Hamse Kjerstadius, Giorgio Mannina, Anurag Bhambhani, Daniele Di Trapani, Zoran Kapelan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There is a trend towards decentralized source separation (DSS) for wastewater treatment and resource recovery. An assessment framework is required to assess whether implementing a DSS treatment over a conventional centralized one is advantageous. This framework needs to account for the performance of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and the effect that resource recovery has on closely linked sectors such as food and energy production. A framework is lacking that covers the economic dimension, the circularity, the nature of reciprocity of resource recovery and can be applied to real-life cases. A novel WFE framework has been developed here to compare a conventional centralized and a DSS-based WWTP. This novel WFE framework contains assessment methods that are reproducible, and applicable to real-life cases. It also accounts for the local climatic conditions that determine irrigation water requirements. The comparison results revealed that the need to construct new DSS infrastructure leads to a lower economic efficiency of water treatment. Further, chemical-intensive treatment reduces the DSS's material resource circularity and efficiency. Using heat pumps increases the energy use of the DSS WWTP, causing a reduction in water treatment energy efficiency. However, the advantages of DSS show up in the freshwater and nutrient efficiency of food production as well as in the energy self-sufficiency of the WWTP. The novel WFE framework contains indicators specific to water treatment and the food production sectors to improve inter-sectoral communication. Also, including the nature reciprocity assessment can help demonstrate the issue with treated wastewater discharge, especially in arid regions with low stream flows. It can potentially help improve the acceptance of treated wastewater-based reuse. To conclude, the novel framework helps to assess real-life case studies in a more integrated and holistic way. It can help make decisions related to decentralization and source separation by simultaneously considering the water treatment, energy production, and food production sectors. • DSS with heat pumps can lead to energy positive wastewater treatment. • Source separation deserves precedence over decentralization. • Chemical-intensive treatment processes lead to low material efficiency. • The greatest advantage of DSS is a higher food production energy efficiency.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 489
Nordvästra Skånes Vatten och Avlopp (Sweden) (SE), Stryker (Netherlands) (NL), University of Palermo (IT), Delft University of Technology (NL)
H2020 European Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.