Assessing compressibility and hydraulic conductivity relationships of oil sands tailings derived from a combined constant-pressure filtration and incremental cake compression test

A filtration–consolidation (F-C) technique is proposed to determine the nonlinear consolidation constitutive relationships for compressibility ( e– σ′) and void ratio–hydraulic conductivity ( k– e). A single constant filtration pressure was applied to three different oil sand tailings slurries, including two samples of fluid fine tailings (FFT) known for their high plasticity, and a mixture of FFT and sand tailings classified as a material with low plasticity. This was done using OFITE's Multi-Unit filter press to observe the pressure-dependent behavior of the average specific cake resistance. Incremental compression pressure was also used to determine equilibrium cake porosities at different applied pressure levels. Filtrate flux measurements and calculated equilibrium cake porosities were used with an iterative nonlinear curve fitting algorithm to determine empirical parameters of constitutive equations. Comparison with multi-step large strain consolidation (MLSC) tests shows F-C test compressibility data closely matching MLSC test data within the F-C pressure range, with no statistically significant difference observed between the two datasets. Nevertheless, the hydraulic conductivity trend observed in the F-C test resembled that of the MLSC test, albeit being one order of magnitude lower. Overall, the F-C test offers a rapid method to assess the filterability of oil sands tailings and to derive the large strain consolidation behavior of the tested samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0325
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing compressibility and hydraulic conductivity relationships of oil sands tailings derived from a combined constant-pressure filtration and incremental cake compression test

Mahmoud Ahmed, Heather Kaminsky, Nicholas Beier
4 citations
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
3.81
article

Assessing compressibility and hydraulic conductivity relationships of oil sands tailings derived from a combined constant-pressure filtration and incremental cake compression test

Mahmoud Ahmed, Heather Kaminsky, Nicholas Beier
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A filtration–consolidation (F-C) technique is proposed to determine the nonlinear consolidation constitutive relationships for compressibility ( e– σ′) and void ratio–hydraulic conductivity ( k– e). A single constant filtration pressure was applied to three different oil sand tailings slurries, including two samples of fluid fine tailings (FFT) known for their high plasticity, and a mixture of FFT and sand tailings classified as a material with low plasticity. This was done using OFITE's Multi-Unit filter press to observe the pressure-dependent behavior of the average specific cake resistance. Incremental compression pressure was also used to determine equilibrium cake porosities at different applied pressure levels. Filtrate flux measurements and calculated equilibrium cake porosities were used with an iterative nonlinear curve fitting algorithm to determine empirical parameters of constitutive equations. Comparison with multi-step large strain consolidation (MLSC) tests shows F-C test compressibility data closely matching MLSC test data within the F-C pressure range, with no statistically significant difference observed between the two datasets. Nevertheless, the hydraulic conductivity trend observed in the F-C test resembled that of the MLSC test, albeit being one order of magnitude lower. Overall, the F-C test offers a rapid method to assess the filterability of oil sands tailings and to derive the large strain consolidation behavior of the tested samples.

Canadian Geotechnical JournalVol. 62
University of Alberta (CA), Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (CA)
Canada's Oil Sands Innovation Alliance, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.