Carl Hempel and the Analytical Tradition

This article brings into debate two contemporary traditions – one of French origin, dominant in the historiographical scenario of the mid-twentieth century, the Annales, and another of German-English tradition, represented above all by the works of the philosopher Carl Hempel. The dialogue between them and, eventually, the symptomatic lack of communication, gives rise to a discussion about the scientificity of history, an important theme to both positions and widely debated in the 1940s and 1950s. The hypothesis is that disciplinary contacts, academic hierarchies and the theoretical borders observed from this debate help to understand fundamental elements of the dynamics of academic consecration in that context, beyond the agreement or disagreement that can be observed at the level of the theory of history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transversal International Journal for the Historiography of Science
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2024.i17.09
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carl Hempel and the Analytical Tradition

Alexandra Dias Ferraz Tedesco
Transversal International Journal for the Historiography of Science
Philosophy, Science, and History
article

Carl Hempel and the Analytical Tradition

Alexandra Dias Ferraz Tedesco
article en

Abstract

This article brings into debate two contemporary traditions – one of French origin, dominant in the historiographical scenario of the mid-twentieth century, the Annales, and another of German-English tradition, represented above all by the works of the philosopher Carl Hempel. The dialogue between them and, eventually, the symptomatic lack of communication, gives rise to a discussion about the scientificity of history, an important theme to both positions and widely debated in the 1940s and 1950s. The hypothesis is that disciplinary contacts, academic hierarchies and the theoretical borders observed from this debate help to understand fundamental elements of the dynamics of academic consecration in that context, beyond the agreement or disagreement that can be observed at the level of the theory of history.

Transversal International Journal for the Historiography of Science(17)
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Philosophy, Science, and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.