Mortimer Taube’s Critique of AI

This paper revisits Mortimer Taube’s Computers and Common Sense: The Myth of Thinking Machines (1961), positioning his critique of artificial intelligence (AI) within the broader frameworks of the history and philosophy of science (HPS) and science and technology studies (STS). While often recognized for its relevance to early AI debates, Taube’s work offers insights that extend beyond computing. He critiques the technocratic optimism present in many scientific fields, highlighting the tendency of scientific enterprises to overpromise and underdeliver. Taube explores how scientific legitimacy is constructed and the societal consequences of scientific overreach. This paper situates Taube’s critique within philosophical debates on the limits of scientific authority and speculative claims. Additionally, Taube’s ethical concerns about the misallocation of public resources toward speculative research are examined. His critique remains, therefore, relevant today, particularly in discussions around AI, quantum computing, and biotechnology, emphasizing the need for empirical rigor and ethical oversight. By situating Taube’s work within broader mid-20th-century critiques of science and technology, this paper underscores its enduring value for understanding modern scientific challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transversal International Journal for the Historiography of Science
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2024.i17.10
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mortimer Taube’s Critique of AI

Alberto Bardi
Transversal International Journal for the Historiography of Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Mortimer Taube’s Critique of AI

Alberto Bardi
article en

Abstract

This paper revisits Mortimer Taube’s Computers and Common Sense: The Myth of Thinking Machines (1961), positioning his critique of artificial intelligence (AI) within the broader frameworks of the history and philosophy of science (HPS) and science and technology studies (STS). While often recognized for its relevance to early AI debates, Taube’s work offers insights that extend beyond computing. He critiques the technocratic optimism present in many scientific fields, highlighting the tendency of scientific enterprises to overpromise and underdeliver. Taube explores how scientific legitimacy is constructed and the societal consequences of scientific overreach. This paper situates Taube’s critique within philosophical debates on the limits of scientific authority and speculative claims. Additionally, Taube’s ethical concerns about the misallocation of public resources toward speculative research are examined. His critique remains, therefore, relevant today, particularly in discussions around AI, quantum computing, and biotechnology, emphasizing the need for empirical rigor and ethical oversight. By situating Taube’s work within broader mid-20th-century critiques of science and technology, this paper underscores its enduring value for understanding modern scientific challenges.

Transversal International Journal for the Historiography of Science(17)
Tsinghua University (CN)
Tsinghua University
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.