Microproteins Tracking: When Size Does Really Matter

Microproteins are a large, relatively underexplored group of proteins with unclear classification criteria. Their primary distinguishing feature is their small size, typically ranging from 7–20 kDa range. This fact imposes certain limitations on available methods of functional research in the field of microproteins: (i) during proteome experiments, they are difficult to detect in total protein mass, (ii) their isolation is complicated; (iii) they are hard to track with conventional bioengineering tools such as fluorescent proteins, as most of the labels are larger than the microproteins themselves. Several sophisticated approaches were developed to search and validate small proteins in translatome and proteome studies, of which the best known are deep sequencing and mass spectrometry-based methods. However, there is still a lack of efficient tools to investigate their actual biological form and function. Here, we review the existing methods for the detection and study of proteins, whose sizes are significantly smaller than the average, and propose possible tools that have not yet been applied, but hold a high potential in this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews and Advances in Chemistry
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s2634827624600324
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biotin and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microproteins Tracking: When Size Does Really Matter

Anna A. Kudriaeva, Alexey A. Belogurov, A. M. Ryskina
2 citations
Reviews and Advances in Chemistry
Biotin and Related Studies
0.65
article

Microproteins Tracking: When Size Does Really Matter

Anna A. Kudriaeva, Alexey A. Belogurov, A. M. Ryskina
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Microproteins are a large, relatively underexplored group of proteins with unclear classification criteria. Their primary distinguishing feature is their small size, typically ranging from 7–20 kDa range. This fact imposes certain limitations on available methods of functional research in the field of microproteins: (i) during proteome experiments, they are difficult to detect in total protein mass, (ii) their isolation is complicated; (iii) they are hard to track with conventional bioengineering tools such as fluorescent proteins, as most of the labels are larger than the microproteins themselves. Several sophisticated approaches were developed to search and validate small proteins in translatome and proteome studies, of which the best known are deep sequencing and mass spectrometry-based methods. However, there is still a lack of efficient tools to investigate their actual biological form and function. Here, we review the existing methods for the detection and study of proteins, whose sizes are significantly smaller than the average, and propose possible tools that have not yet been applied, but hold a high potential in this field.

Reviews and Advances in ChemistryVol. 14(4)
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry (RU), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Biotin and Related Studies
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.