Crown structure indicates tree secondary growth, competition legacy, and growth potential of dominant species in Europe

• The relationship between crown structure and tree secondary growth across species is studied. • Strong relationships observed across species between crown structure and growth ring patterns. • Coniferous crowns explained secondary growth better than broadleaf crowns. • Short- and long-term ecological memory is manifested in 3D crown structure. • Crown structure is a good predictor for the past and future growth potential. Crown trait-based ecology has significantly advanced, yet a substantial knowledge gap remains regarding its predictive power on internal tree morphology and future growth potential across different species. Our research addressed this gap by examining how crown traits of various species manifest in temporal tree growth dynamics by answering three research questions (QⅠ): Are there general relationships between crown structure and secondary growth across species? (QⅡ) How do crown structure and secondary growth links vary among species and functional groups? (QⅢ) To what extent does a tree’s crown structure explain the variation in secondary growth over different periods? We conducted a comprehensive study to answer these questions, utilizing high-resolution 3D crown structure data from terrestrial laser scanning and growth ring data from tree coring. Our research explored the relationship between crown structure and growth rings in six dominant tree species in Europe ( Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Pinus sylvestris L., Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco, Larix decidua Mill., Fagus sylvatica L., and Quercus robur L.) across Germany and Spain. These species, representing diverse functional identities, provide a comprehensive spectrum for analysis, ensuring the robustness of our findings. Our findings demonstrated a consistent link between crown structure (explained by projection area, crown length, ratio, slenderness, top-heaviness, etc.) and secondary growth, varying across species and functional identities. Coniferous species (e.g., P. abies , P. menziesii , L. decidua) generally exhibited stronger associations between crown structure and tree ring width than broadleaf; in contrast, P. sylvestris and Q. robur demonstrated weaker predictive relationships due to their lower crown plasticity and more episodic growth. The current crown structure was a reliable predictor of tree secondary growth over decadal scales. However, stronger relationships emerged when considering the entire tree ring series, suggesting a long-term morphological legacy effect of crown structure. These results show the importance of understanding how specific traits related to different tree species and their functional roles impact tree structure and growth. By better understanding how trees adapt (plasticity) and how their past growth affects future development (crown legacy), we can manage environmental challenges more effectively. Therefore, this knowledge is valuable for improving forest management practices and offers useful insights for professionals working in forestry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113074
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crown structure indicates tree secondary growth, competition legacy, and growth potential of dominant species in Europe

Shamim Ahmed, Frederico Tupinambá‐Simões, Felipe Bravo, Hans Pretzsch et al.
7 citations
Ecological Indicators
Forest ecology and management
16.19
article

Crown structure indicates tree secondary growth, competition legacy, and growth potential of dominant species in Europe

Shamim Ahmed, Frederico Tupinambá‐Simões, Felipe Bravo, Hans Pretzsch, Miren del Rı́o, Enno Uhl, Torben Hilmers
article en
7 citations

Abstract

• The relationship between crown structure and tree secondary growth across species is studied. • Strong relationships observed across species between crown structure and growth ring patterns. • Coniferous crowns explained secondary growth better than broadleaf crowns. • Short- and long-term ecological memory is manifested in 3D crown structure. • Crown structure is a good predictor for the past and future growth potential. Crown trait-based ecology has significantly advanced, yet a substantial knowledge gap remains regarding its predictive power on internal tree morphology and future growth potential across different species. Our research addressed this gap by examining how crown traits of various species manifest in temporal tree growth dynamics by answering three research questions (QⅠ): Are there general relationships between crown structure and secondary growth across species? (QⅡ) How do crown structure and secondary growth links vary among species and functional groups? (QⅢ) To what extent does a tree’s crown structure explain the variation in secondary growth over different periods? We conducted a comprehensive study to answer these questions, utilizing high-resolution 3D crown structure data from terrestrial laser scanning and growth ring data from tree coring. Our research explored the relationship between crown structure and growth rings in six dominant tree species in Europe ( Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Pinus sylvestris L., Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco, Larix decidua Mill., Fagus sylvatica L., and Quercus robur L.) across Germany and Spain. These species, representing diverse functional identities, provide a comprehensive spectrum for analysis, ensuring the robustness of our findings. Our findings demonstrated a consistent link between crown structure (explained by projection area, crown length, ratio, slenderness, top-heaviness, etc.) and secondary growth, varying across species and functional identities. Coniferous species (e.g., P. abies , P. menziesii , L. decidua) generally exhibited stronger associations between crown structure and tree ring width than broadleaf; in contrast, P. sylvestris and Q. robur demonstrated weaker predictive relationships due to their lower crown plasticity and more episodic growth. The current crown structure was a reliable predictor of tree secondary growth over decadal scales. However, stronger relationships emerged when considering the entire tree ring series, suggesting a long-term morphological legacy effect of crown structure. These results show the importance of understanding how specific traits related to different tree species and their functional roles impact tree structure and growth. By better understanding how trees adapt (plasticity) and how their past growth affects future development (crown legacy), we can manage environmental challenges more effectively. Therefore, this knowledge is valuable for improving forest management practices and offers useful insights for professionals working in forestry.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 170
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture (DE), Management Research Institute (US), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Forest ecology and management
16.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.