Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia, adductor canal block, and combination of both in postoperative pain management for total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this research was to conduct a comprehensive investigation and analysis of the factors contributing to variations in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores among post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who have received different pain management approaches.METHODS: This study encompassed the entire population of post-total knee arthroplasty patients at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Central General Hospital, Makassar (Indonesia), from July 2021 to July 2022. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups: one receiving local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and another receiving adductor canal block (ACB). Daily data collection included VAS scores, postoperative opioid usage, and the duration of hospital stays. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The analytical process involved descriptive statistics for data characterization, frequency distributions for visualizing data distribution, and the Kruskal-Wallis Test.RESULTS: The analysis revealed significant differences in mean VAS 1 (24 hours postoperation) and VAS 2 (48 hours postoperation) scores among the treatment groups (P<0.01). Specifically, the ACB group exhibited significantly lower scores than the control group (P<0.01). In contrast, no significant differences were observed between the LIA and ACB+LIA groups (P>0.05) for both VAS 1 and VAS 2. At the 72-hour postoperation mark (VAS 3), no significant differences were detected among the treatment groups (P>0.05). While the ACB group had the lowest mean VAS 3 score (0.17) and the control group had the highest (0.44), all groups achieved similar pain control levels at this stage.CONCLUSIONS: ACB effectively mitigated early postoperative pain, as evidenced by significantly lower VAS 1 and VAS 2 scores than the control group. However, pain control became comparable across all treatment groups at the 72-hour postoperation assessment. These findings hold important implications for optimizing pain management strategies in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23736/s0393-3660.24.05413-5
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia, adductor canal block, and combination of both in postoperative pain management for total knee arthroplasty

Muhammad Andry Usman, Notinas Horas, Kristina A. WINARTO
Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of local infiltration anesthesia, adductor canal block, and combination of both in postoperative pain management for total knee arthroplasty

Muhammad Andry Usman, Notinas Horas, Kristina A. WINARTO
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this research was to conduct a comprehensive investigation and analysis of the factors contributing to variations in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores among post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who have received different pain management approaches.METHODS: This study encompassed the entire population of post-total knee arthroplasty patients at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Central General Hospital, Makassar (Indonesia), from July 2021 to July 2022. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups: one receiving local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and another receiving adductor canal block (ACB). Daily data collection included VAS scores, postoperative opioid usage, and the duration of hospital stays. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The analytical process involved descriptive statistics for data characterization, frequency distributions for visualizing data distribution, and the Kruskal-Wallis Test.RESULTS: The analysis revealed significant differences in mean VAS 1 (24 hours postoperation) and VAS 2 (48 hours postoperation) scores among the treatment groups (P<0.01). Specifically, the ACB group exhibited significantly lower scores than the control group (P<0.01). In contrast, no significant differences were observed between the LIA and ACB+LIA groups (P>0.05) for both VAS 1 and VAS 2. At the 72-hour postoperation mark (VAS 3), no significant differences were detected among the treatment groups (P>0.05). While the ACB group had the lowest mean VAS 3 score (0.17) and the control group had the highest (0.44), all groups achieved similar pain control levels at this stage.CONCLUSIONS: ACB effectively mitigated early postoperative pain, as evidenced by significantly lower VAS 1 and VAS 2 scores than the control group. However, pain control became comparable across all treatment groups at the 72-hour postoperation assessment. These findings hold important implications for optimizing pain management strategies in clinical practice.

Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze MedicheVol. 183(11)
Hasanuddin University (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.