OP10 Affordability Decision Rules: Systematic Review And Categorization Of Budget Impact Thresholds For 174 Countries Based On International Practices

Introduction Effective health intervention coverage decision-making hinges on understanding budget impact (BI). Despite progress in estimating cost-effectiveness thresholds, a standardized approach for defining BI, particularly high BI, remains elusive. Addressing this gap, our systematic review aims to identify existing BI thresholds and establish universally applicable BI categories, providing a much-needed framework for global health policy. Methods In our systematic review, we adhered to Cochrane methods and PRISMA reporting guidelines (PROSPERO protocol CRD42020221652). We included articles that detailed current BI or affordability thresholds used by national or regional healthcare systems, sourcing from PubMed, Embase, and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) communications. To address variability across jurisdictions, we normalized BI/affordability thresholds to a fraction of each country’s total healthcare expenditure. This approach enabled us to categorize BI thresholds into four distinct levels (low, moderate, high, and very high) and apply these categories universally across countries. Results We retrieved 1,592 records, identifying affordability thresholds and their underlying rationales in 12 countries: Argentina, Australia, England, Canada, Germany, France, Netherlands, USA, Taiwan, Ukraine, Scotland, and Singapore. Utilizing this data, we established four BI threshold levels relative to the total health budget: low (below 0.00005), moderate (0.00005 to <0.0001), high (0.0001 to <0.0002), and very high (>=0.0002). We then extrapolated these thresholds, along with their uncertainty ranges, to 174 countries, using 2022 World Bank data. Conclusions Our study provides a comprehensive overview of current global affordability thresholds and their implications for healthcare coverage and reimbursement. We found that explicit BI thresholds are predominantly established in high-income countries. Our findings offer critical, evidence-based guidance on affordability decision rules, applicable to health systems in 174 countries, thereby contributing significantly to the standardization and informed policymaking in global healthcare.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324000746
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP10 Affordability Decision Rules: Systematic Review And Categorization Of Budget Impact Thresholds For 174 Countries Based On International Practices

Federico Rodríguez Cairoli, Sebastián García Martí, Federico Augustovski, Andrés Pichón-Rivière
1 links
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

OP10 Affordability Decision Rules: Systematic Review And Categorization Of Budget Impact Thresholds For 174 Countries Based On International Practices

Federico Rodríguez Cairoli, Sebastián García Martí, Federico Augustovski, Andrés Pichón-Rivière
article en

Abstract

Introduction Effective health intervention coverage decision-making hinges on understanding budget impact (BI). Despite progress in estimating cost-effectiveness thresholds, a standardized approach for defining BI, particularly high BI, remains elusive. Addressing this gap, our systematic review aims to identify existing BI thresholds and establish universally applicable BI categories, providing a much-needed framework for global health policy. Methods In our systematic review, we adhered to Cochrane methods and PRISMA reporting guidelines (PROSPERO protocol CRD42020221652). We included articles that detailed current BI or affordability thresholds used by national or regional healthcare systems, sourcing from PubMed, Embase, and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) communications. To address variability across jurisdictions, we normalized BI/affordability thresholds to a fraction of each country’s total healthcare expenditure. This approach enabled us to categorize BI thresholds into four distinct levels (low, moderate, high, and very high) and apply these categories universally across countries. Results We retrieved 1,592 records, identifying affordability thresholds and their underlying rationales in 12 countries: Argentina, Australia, England, Canada, Germany, France, Netherlands, USA, Taiwan, Ukraine, Scotland, and Singapore. Utilizing this data, we established four BI threshold levels relative to the total health budget: low (below 0.00005), moderate (0.00005 to <0.0001), high (0.0001 to <0.0002), and very high (>=0.0002). We then extrapolated these thresholds, along with their uncertainty ranges, to 174 countries, using 2022 World Bank data. Conclusions Our study provides a comprehensive overview of current global affordability thresholds and their implications for healthcare coverage and reimbursement. We found that explicit BI thresholds are predominantly established in high-income countries. Our findings offer critical, evidence-based guidance on affordability decision rules, applicable to health systems in 174 countries, thereby contributing significantly to the standardization and informed policymaking in global healthcare.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.