PD13 Cost Effectiveness Of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam Compared With Colistina-Imipenem For Treating Confirmed Carbapenem Non-Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Introduction Antimicrobial resistance is an important public health problem with a strong epidemiological, economic, and social impact. The objective of this analysis was to compare the cost effectiveness of imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI/CIL/REL) therapy with colistin-imipenem for the treatment of hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacterial infection caused by imipenem-resistant pathogens. Methods The population comprised patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia that was complicated with an intra-abdominal or urinary tract infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The model started with a short-term decision tree describing possible treatment routes and outcomes for patients during hospitalization. After treatment, patients were classified as cured, not cured, or dead. Patients who had not responded to the initial treatment received another line of therapy. Successfully treated patients were entered into the long-term Markov model, which captured follow-up costs and health-related quality of life over their lifetimes. Results The analysis was conducted on a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients and demonstrated that IMI/CIL/REL therapy was advantageous in terms of diagnosis and treatment in the short term as well as cost effectiveness. In fact, IMI/CIL/REL therapy was dominant, compared with colistin-imipenem, from the National Health System and the societal perspective, providing an average saving of EUR2,800.15 and EUR3,174.63, respectively, and gains of 4.76 years of life and 4.12 quality-adjusted life-years per patient. Conclusions Thanks to its economic and societal value, IMI/CIL/REL therapy represents an investment in health that is lifesaving in critically ill patients and is a valuable public health tool in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324002812
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD13 Cost Effectiveness Of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam Compared With Colistina-Imipenem For Treating Confirmed Carbapenem Non-Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Francesco Saverio Mennini, Andrea Marcellusi, Martina Paoletti, Joe Yang
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

PD13 Cost Effectiveness Of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam Compared With Colistina-Imipenem For Treating Confirmed Carbapenem Non-Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Francesco Saverio Mennini, Andrea Marcellusi, Martina Paoletti, Joe Yang
article en

Abstract

Introduction Antimicrobial resistance is an important public health problem with a strong epidemiological, economic, and social impact. The objective of this analysis was to compare the cost effectiveness of imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI/CIL/REL) therapy with colistin-imipenem for the treatment of hospitalized patients with Gram-negative bacterial infection caused by imipenem-resistant pathogens. Methods The population comprised patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia that was complicated with an intra-abdominal or urinary tract infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The model started with a short-term decision tree describing possible treatment routes and outcomes for patients during hospitalization. After treatment, patients were classified as cured, not cured, or dead. Patients who had not responded to the initial treatment received another line of therapy. Successfully treated patients were entered into the long-term Markov model, which captured follow-up costs and health-related quality of life over their lifetimes. Results The analysis was conducted on a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients and demonstrated that IMI/CIL/REL therapy was advantageous in terms of diagnosis and treatment in the short term as well as cost effectiveness. In fact, IMI/CIL/REL therapy was dominant, compared with colistin-imipenem, from the National Health System and the societal perspective, providing an average saving of EUR2,800.15 and EUR3,174.63, respectively, and gains of 4.76 years of life and 4.12 quality-adjusted life-years per patient. Conclusions Thanks to its economic and societal value, IMI/CIL/REL therapy represents an investment in health that is lifesaving in critically ill patients and is a valuable public health tool in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PD13 Cost Effectiveness Of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam Compared With Colistina-Imipenem For Treating Confirmed Carbapenem Non-Susceptible Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections — Francesco Saverio Mennini, Andrea Marcellusi, et al. · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS