OP21 Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes In Chinese Setting

Introduction IDegLira is a fixed-ratio combination (FRC) comprising insulin degludec and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) liraglutide, used for treating uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. We aimed to compare the long-term clinical and cost outcomes between IDegLira and basal-bolus insulin therapy by analyzing data from the Chinese healthcare system. Methods The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model was employed to compare the two treatments. Cohort characteristics were derived from DUAL II China in patients with uncontrolled T2DM on basal insulin. Efficacy data were sourced from a published indirect comparative analysis. Utilities, medication, and complications costs were taken from publications. All costs were calculated in Chinese yuan (CNY) and discounted to 2022. The long-term outcomes estimated by the model spanned 40 years and encompassed life years (LY), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications, time alive and free of complication, costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results IDegLira was associated with increased LY (12.46 vs 12.413), increased QALY (10.946 vs 10.669), and reduced costs (CNY408,580.94 [USD56,407.22] vs CNY586,937.81 [USD81,030.54]) compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy. IDegLira was dominant compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy and exhibited a reduction in the cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications. Additionally, IDegLira extended the time alive and free of complications. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed with 100 percent accuracy that IDegLira is more cost effective as compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy. Conclusions Based on this analysis, IDegLira can be fully regarded as a dominant treatment compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy in Chinese patients with uncontrolled T2DM on basal insulin.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324000849
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OP21 Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes In Chinese Setting

Junling Weng, Yingyao Chen, Dunming Xiao
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

OP21 Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes In Chinese Setting

Junling Weng, Yingyao Chen, Dunming Xiao
article en

Abstract

Introduction IDegLira is a fixed-ratio combination (FRC) comprising insulin degludec and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) liraglutide, used for treating uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. We aimed to compare the long-term clinical and cost outcomes between IDegLira and basal-bolus insulin therapy by analyzing data from the Chinese healthcare system. Methods The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model was employed to compare the two treatments. Cohort characteristics were derived from DUAL II China in patients with uncontrolled T2DM on basal insulin. Efficacy data were sourced from a published indirect comparative analysis. Utilities, medication, and complications costs were taken from publications. All costs were calculated in Chinese yuan (CNY) and discounted to 2022. The long-term outcomes estimated by the model spanned 40 years and encompassed life years (LY), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications, time alive and free of complication, costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results IDegLira was associated with increased LY (12.46 vs 12.413), increased QALY (10.946 vs 10.669), and reduced costs (CNY408,580.94 [USD56,407.22] vs CNY586,937.81 [USD81,030.54]) compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy. IDegLira was dominant compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy and exhibited a reduction in the cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications. Additionally, IDegLira extended the time alive and free of complications. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed with 100 percent accuracy that IDegLira is more cost effective as compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy. Conclusions Based on this analysis, IDegLira can be fully regarded as a dominant treatment compared to basal-bolus insulin therapy in Chinese patients with uncontrolled T2DM on basal insulin.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

OP21 Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Of IDegLira Versus Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes In Chinese Setting — Junling Weng, Yingyao Chen, et al. · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS