PD40 Pilot Healthcare Programs - Bridging The Evidence Gap For Innovative Technologies

Introduction The scarcity of high quality evidence is a common constraint on the willingness to publicly fund innovative technologies. Our aim was to prepare a Methods and Process Guide to support the development of pilot healthcare programs in Poland. Such guides play a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of pilot programs and confidence in public funding decisions in health care. Methods We reviewed guidelines for pilot healthcare programs published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other healthcare organizations and analyzed the pilot healthcare programs in Poland. The Ministry of Health in Poland and the general public will be invited to provide feedback on the Guide. Results Pilot programs serve as valuable testing grounds for healthcare solutions in low risk, small-scale clinical practice settings. A pilot program may be considered for interventions with proven safety and effectiveness, and when the intervention is complex, its implementation requires testing, or the intervention is considered high cost. Our Methods and Process Guide defines key elements of pilot healthcare programs, including objectives, starting criteria, conducting conditions, and monitoring rules. Public consultation on the Guide is underway. Conclusions The publicly available Methods and Process Guide should enhance the methodological rigor of pilot healthcare programs in Poland. Well-designed pilot programs are expected to provide high quality real-world data that will facilitate public funding decisions for innovative technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324003039
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD40 Pilot Healthcare Programs - Bridging The Evidence Gap For Innovative Technologies

Jakub Gruszka, A Pelczarska, Magdalena Koperny, Katarzyna Sejbuk-Rozbicka et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

PD40 Pilot Healthcare Programs - Bridging The Evidence Gap For Innovative Technologies

Jakub Gruszka, A Pelczarska, Magdalena Koperny, Katarzyna Sejbuk-Rozbicka, Kamila Malinowska, Joanna Syta, Maciej Dzik
article en

Abstract

Introduction The scarcity of high quality evidence is a common constraint on the willingness to publicly fund innovative technologies. Our aim was to prepare a Methods and Process Guide to support the development of pilot healthcare programs in Poland. Such guides play a pivotal role in enhancing the quality of pilot programs and confidence in public funding decisions in health care. Methods We reviewed guidelines for pilot healthcare programs published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other healthcare organizations and analyzed the pilot healthcare programs in Poland. The Ministry of Health in Poland and the general public will be invited to provide feedback on the Guide. Results Pilot programs serve as valuable testing grounds for healthcare solutions in low risk, small-scale clinical practice settings. A pilot program may be considered for interventions with proven safety and effectiveness, and when the intervention is complex, its implementation requires testing, or the intervention is considered high cost. Our Methods and Process Guide defines key elements of pilot healthcare programs, including objectives, starting criteria, conducting conditions, and monitoring rules. Public consultation on the Guide is underway. Conclusions The publicly available Methods and Process Guide should enhance the methodological rigor of pilot healthcare programs in Poland. Well-designed pilot programs are expected to provide high quality real-world data that will facilitate public funding decisions for innovative technologies.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.