PP51 Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index (PII): A New Framework For Assessing Health Technology Innovation Based On Therapeutic And Social Relevance

Introduction The value of a new pharmaceutical product should rely on its therapeutic benefits while also considering social health needs. Adapting health technology assessment (HTA) tools, we propose a transparent framework, with well-defined criteria and script, to determine the value of innovation (i.e., innovativeness) with clinical and methodological parameters, based on the social relevance and therapeutic value of new medicines. Methods The study was developed by adapting HTA-based methods identified in the literature: the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and the EValuation of pharmaceutical Innovations with regard to Therapeutic Advantage (EVITA) tool. A sample of oncology drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2011 and 2021 were assessed by researchers trained in HTA tools using those methods. After assessing the sample, researchers discussed the results, difficulties, and issues experienced. Those issues were addressed, resulting in the creation of the new framework, which included the redefinition of domains, definition of classification criteria for each domain, and scores according to relevance. Results The Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index (PII) was proposed, with a script, domains, criteria, and an algorithm. The evaluation begins defining indication, outcomes, therapeutic alternatives, time perspective, and data sources. Four domains were considered: Therapeutic Need, which evaluates the existence and benefits of alternatives; Added Therapeutic Value, which talks about the incremental clinical benefit when compared to those alternatives (these first two domains were graded into five levels ranging from absent to maximum); Study Design and Methodological Quality, both classified into three levels. Classification criteria for each domain can be adapted according to the indication and relevant outcomes. Conclusions The PII framework considers clinical and social value weighted by methodological limitation of available evidence to determine the value of innovation of pharmaceutical products. It stands out as a transparent, adaptable, and reproducible tool that aims to reduce the subjectivity of analyses and assist with decision-making. PII has the potential to inform decision-making processes involving value-based pricing, reimbursement, and research and development investment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324002228
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP51 Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index (PII): A New Framework For Assessing Health Technology Innovation Based On Therapeutic And Social Relevance

Juliana Álvares-Teodoro, Francisco de Assis Acúrcio, Ludmila Gargano, Augusto Afonso Guerra et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

PP51 Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index (PII): A New Framework For Assessing Health Technology Innovation Based On Therapeutic And Social Relevance

Juliana Álvares-Teodoro, Francisco de Assis Acúrcio, Ludmila Gargano, Augusto Afonso Guerra, Isabela Freitas, Ariane André
article en

Abstract

Introduction The value of a new pharmaceutical product should rely on its therapeutic benefits while also considering social health needs. Adapting health technology assessment (HTA) tools, we propose a transparent framework, with well-defined criteria and script, to determine the value of innovation (i.e., innovativeness) with clinical and methodological parameters, based on the social relevance and therapeutic value of new medicines. Methods The study was developed by adapting HTA-based methods identified in the literature: the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and the EValuation of pharmaceutical Innovations with regard to Therapeutic Advantage (EVITA) tool. A sample of oncology drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2011 and 2021 were assessed by researchers trained in HTA tools using those methods. After assessing the sample, researchers discussed the results, difficulties, and issues experienced. Those issues were addressed, resulting in the creation of the new framework, which included the redefinition of domains, definition of classification criteria for each domain, and scores according to relevance. Results The Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index (PII) was proposed, with a script, domains, criteria, and an algorithm. The evaluation begins defining indication, outcomes, therapeutic alternatives, time perspective, and data sources. Four domains were considered: Therapeutic Need, which evaluates the existence and benefits of alternatives; Added Therapeutic Value, which talks about the incremental clinical benefit when compared to those alternatives (these first two domains were graded into five levels ranging from absent to maximum); Study Design and Methodological Quality, both classified into three levels. Classification criteria for each domain can be adapted according to the indication and relevant outcomes. Conclusions The PII framework considers clinical and social value weighted by methodological limitation of available evidence to determine the value of innovation of pharmaceutical products. It stands out as a transparent, adaptable, and reproducible tool that aims to reduce the subjectivity of analyses and assist with decision-making. PII has the potential to inform decision-making processes involving value-based pricing, reimbursement, and research and development investment.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.