PD213 An Unmet Health-Related Needs Evidence Database For Informing Policy And Innovation Decisions In Health Care

Introduction As there is no standard definition of unmet patient or societal needs, the Needs Examination, Evaluation, Dissemination (NEED) project defined criteria for assessing these needs. This study describes the creation of an exploitable evidence database on unmet health-related patient and societal needs for various health conditions, and how this can be used in decision-making. Methods The NEED framework defines explicit dimensions (patient, societal, and future needs), domains (health, healthcare, and social needs), and criteria, along with specific measurable indicators, to identify unmet health-related patient and societal needs for various health conditions. For each indicator, information sources were sought, including both quantitative and qualitative evidence. For some indicators, guidance on evidence generation was developed. Possible uses of the NEED database were discussed with national and international panels of experts, stakeholders, and decision-makers. Results Data sources were identified for some but not all patient and societal needs criteria. They included existing databases (e.g., the Global Burden of Disease database and administrative databases), literature, and primary data collection. A standardized methodology was defined for primary data collection (quantitative and qualitative). The NEED evidence database can be used by researchers, research funders, regulators, health technology assessment agencies, policymakers, patients, healthcare providers, etcetera for prioritizing areas of research as well as—thanks to the level of detail provided in the database—to assess the extent to which proposed “solutions” meet the most pressing unmet needs of patients or society. Conclusions Once operational, an unmet patient and societal needs evidence database, anchored to an explicit framework, can serve different stakeholders and decision-makers for various purposes. It collects evidence on unmet health-related patient and societal needs for various health conditions, given the current standard of care, independent of any new product or service, and therefore supports a needs-driven healthcare innovation and policy system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324004343
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD213 An Unmet Health-Related Needs Evidence Database For Informing Policy And Innovation Decisions In Health Care

Charline Maertens de Noordhout, Robby De Pauw, Laurence Kohn, Muriel Levy et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PD213 An Unmet Health-Related Needs Evidence Database For Informing Policy And Innovation Decisions In Health Care

Charline Maertens de Noordhout, Robby De Pauw, Laurence Kohn, Muriel Levy, Irina Cleemput, Claudia Schönborn, Rani Claerman, Mats De Jaeger
article en

Abstract

Introduction As there is no standard definition of unmet patient or societal needs, the Needs Examination, Evaluation, Dissemination (NEED) project defined criteria for assessing these needs. This study describes the creation of an exploitable evidence database on unmet health-related patient and societal needs for various health conditions, and how this can be used in decision-making. Methods The NEED framework defines explicit dimensions (patient, societal, and future needs), domains (health, healthcare, and social needs), and criteria, along with specific measurable indicators, to identify unmet health-related patient and societal needs for various health conditions. For each indicator, information sources were sought, including both quantitative and qualitative evidence. For some indicators, guidance on evidence generation was developed. Possible uses of the NEED database were discussed with national and international panels of experts, stakeholders, and decision-makers. Results Data sources were identified for some but not all patient and societal needs criteria. They included existing databases (e.g., the Global Burden of Disease database and administrative databases), literature, and primary data collection. A standardized methodology was defined for primary data collection (quantitative and qualitative). The NEED evidence database can be used by researchers, research funders, regulators, health technology assessment agencies, policymakers, patients, healthcare providers, etcetera for prioritizing areas of research as well as—thanks to the level of detail provided in the database—to assess the extent to which proposed “solutions” meet the most pressing unmet needs of patients or society. Conclusions Once operational, an unmet patient and societal needs evidence database, anchored to an explicit framework, can serve different stakeholders and decision-makers for various purposes. It collects evidence on unmet health-related patient and societal needs for various health conditions, given the current standard of care, independent of any new product or service, and therefore supports a needs-driven healthcare innovation and policy system.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.