OD29 From Listening To Lift Off: Developing A Three-Year Public Involvement And Engagement Strategy For NICE

Introduction Involving patients in the health technology assessment (HTA) lifecycle is a core principle at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). To achieve this, NICE has adopted a mixed approach to patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) spanning the entire appraisal process. To ensure the PPIE approach enables meaningful involvement, NICE engaged with stakeholders to review its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. Methods In 2023, an independent consultant reviewed NICE’s PPIE approach and engaged with NICE staff and external stakeholders from patient organizations, individual patient contributors, and engagement leads at national health and social care organizations. The engagement included interviews with NICE staff (n=19) and external stakeholders (n=13), and an online survey that received 83 responses from patient organizations and patient contributors. Using this feedback, NICE’s patient and public involvement program conducted four focus groups to develop a framework of improved methods and processes for PPIE with NICE staff, patient organizations, and patient contributors. Results The engagement identified many positives in NICE’s approach to PPIE, including: • lay members sitting on each HTA committee as equal members • patient organizations providing written evidence to HTA committees • patient experts providing written and verbal testimony to HTA committees • support provided by NICE. The engagement also identified areas where PPIE could have a greater impact, including: • improved methods for collecting patient evidence and insight • strengthening the role of lay members • collating and reusing previously collected patient evidence • taking a proportionate approach to involving small organizations • allocating staff resources to focus on impactful PPIE practices. Conclusions NICE has developed a draft framework for an improved approach to increase the impact of PPIE in HTA decision-making. In 2024, NICE will publicly consult with NICE staff and external stakeholders to review the framework, agree the strategic aims, and develop metrics for measuring success. Following this consultation, the findings and NICE’s updated approach to PPIE will be presented.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324001600
Primary Topic
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OD29 From Listening To Lift Off: Developing A Three-Year Public Involvement And Engagement Strategy For NICE

Laura Norburn, Helen Crosbie, Mandy Tonkinson, Mark Rasburn et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
article

OD29 From Listening To Lift Off: Developing A Three-Year Public Involvement And Engagement Strategy For NICE

Laura Norburn, Helen Crosbie, Mandy Tonkinson, Mark Rasburn, Sally Taylor, Heidi Livingstone, Ella Fitzpatrick, Clare Morgan, Janine Wigmore
article en

Abstract

Introduction Involving patients in the health technology assessment (HTA) lifecycle is a core principle at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). To achieve this, NICE has adopted a mixed approach to patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) spanning the entire appraisal process. To ensure the PPIE approach enables meaningful involvement, NICE engaged with stakeholders to review its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. Methods In 2023, an independent consultant reviewed NICE’s PPIE approach and engaged with NICE staff and external stakeholders from patient organizations, individual patient contributors, and engagement leads at national health and social care organizations. The engagement included interviews with NICE staff (n=19) and external stakeholders (n=13), and an online survey that received 83 responses from patient organizations and patient contributors. Using this feedback, NICE’s patient and public involvement program conducted four focus groups to develop a framework of improved methods and processes for PPIE with NICE staff, patient organizations, and patient contributors. Results The engagement identified many positives in NICE’s approach to PPIE, including: • lay members sitting on each HTA committee as equal members • patient organizations providing written evidence to HTA committees • patient experts providing written and verbal testimony to HTA committees • support provided by NICE. The engagement also identified areas where PPIE could have a greater impact, including: • improved methods for collecting patient evidence and insight • strengthening the role of lay members • collating and reusing previously collected patient evidence • taking a proportionate approach to involving small organizations • allocating staff resources to focus on impactful PPIE practices. Conclusions NICE has developed a draft framework for an improved approach to increase the impact of PPIE in HTA decision-making. In 2024, NICE will publicly consult with NICE staff and external stakeholders to review the framework, agree the strategic aims, and develop metrics for measuring success. Following this consultation, the findings and NICE’s updated approach to PPIE will be presented.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Service-Learning and Community Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.