PP56 National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups Are Essential For Successful Implementation Of The European Health Technology Assessment Regulation

Introduction Starting from 2030, vaccines in the European Union (EU) require joint clinical assessments (JCAs), and joint scientific consultations (JSCs) can be requested from 2025. Involvement of national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) is crucial to address vaccine specificities. However, NITAGs are currently not considered in the EU health technology assessment (HTA) framework. This study highlights potential risks for non-applicability of vaccine JCA reports nationally. Methods This study examined where in the JCA and JSC implementation process NITAGs could play an important role and highlighted the practical challenges of incorporating vaccine JCA reports into already very heterogeneous and complex vaccine access pathways across EU Member States. The EU HTA Regulation process was tested for three countries with different vaccine market access characteristics. This study was conducted using JCA guidance documents, NITAG vaccine assessment guidelines, and communications with the respective decision-making bodies. Results The EU HTA Regulation framework requires adjustments for vaccine-specific considerations. NITAGs across the EU vary in experience, resources, expertise, and influence on decision-making regarding vaccine assessment and inclusion in the national immunization program. In addition to JCA and JSC, the EU HTA framework also covers horizon scanning, which several NITAGs are currently involved with at national level.. However, the EU HTA framework currently lacks explicit requirements for NITAG input in horizon scanning, JSC, and JCA processes. This could lead to unnecessary duplication of work, further complexity of the processes, and lengthening of population time to access to new vaccines. Conclusions The EU HTA framework of vaccines aims to avoid duplicate efforts and enhance patient access, but current processes that will be introduced may not achieve this optimally. Early and systematic inclusion of NITAGs in the horizon scanning, JSC, and JCA processes is pivotal to mitigate the risk of non-applicability and to successfully realize the objectives of the EU HTA framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324002277
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP56 National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups Are Essential For Successful Implementation Of The European Health Technology Assessment Regulation

Jasmijn Beekman, Gabriel Gurgel, Sharon Wolters, Ramesh Marapin et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

PP56 National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups Are Essential For Successful Implementation Of The European Health Technology Assessment Regulation

Jasmijn Beekman, Gabriel Gurgel, Sharon Wolters, Ramesh Marapin, Anna Viceré
article en

Abstract

Introduction Starting from 2030, vaccines in the European Union (EU) require joint clinical assessments (JCAs), and joint scientific consultations (JSCs) can be requested from 2025. Involvement of national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) is crucial to address vaccine specificities. However, NITAGs are currently not considered in the EU health technology assessment (HTA) framework. This study highlights potential risks for non-applicability of vaccine JCA reports nationally. Methods This study examined where in the JCA and JSC implementation process NITAGs could play an important role and highlighted the practical challenges of incorporating vaccine JCA reports into already very heterogeneous and complex vaccine access pathways across EU Member States. The EU HTA Regulation process was tested for three countries with different vaccine market access characteristics. This study was conducted using JCA guidance documents, NITAG vaccine assessment guidelines, and communications with the respective decision-making bodies. Results The EU HTA Regulation framework requires adjustments for vaccine-specific considerations. NITAGs across the EU vary in experience, resources, expertise, and influence on decision-making regarding vaccine assessment and inclusion in the national immunization program. In addition to JCA and JSC, the EU HTA framework also covers horizon scanning, which several NITAGs are currently involved with at national level.. However, the EU HTA framework currently lacks explicit requirements for NITAG input in horizon scanning, JSC, and JCA processes. This could lead to unnecessary duplication of work, further complexity of the processes, and lengthening of population time to access to new vaccines. Conclusions The EU HTA framework of vaccines aims to avoid duplicate efforts and enhance patient access, but current processes that will be introduced may not achieve this optimally. Early and systematic inclusion of NITAGs in the horizon scanning, JSC, and JCA processes is pivotal to mitigate the risk of non-applicability and to successfully realize the objectives of the EU HTA framework.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.