PP52 Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index – FDA-Approved Prostate Cancer Medications (2011 To 2021): A Case Study

Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) constitutes 13.5% of all cancer cases globally. Treatment is individualized and depends on various factors. In recent years, there has been an increase in the approval of drugs for the disease by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study aimed to assess the innovativeness of FDA-approved drugs for PC treatment from 2011 to 2021. Methods A search was conducted in the FDA database to identify medications approved from 2011 to 2021 and their supporting studies for approval. The assessment of the value of innovations was performed through the Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index (PII), a methodology that quantitatively evaluates innovations in four domains: Therapeutic Need and Added Therapeutic Value of the new medication (graded on five levels from important to absent), and Study Design and Methodological Quality (graded on three levels) of the pivotal studies used as a data source for evaluation. Medications are assessed for a specific clinical indication and compared to available therapeutic alternatives. Results Seven medications were identified for the treatment of PC, targeting different stages of the disease. The drugs were evaluated with a score ranging from 0 to 100, measuring the degree of innovativeness across the four assessed domains. Five (70%) medications scored above 50.0. The majority of the medications addressed a significant Therapeutic Need (n=4; 56%). The Added Therapeutic Value was assessed based on the survival gain compared to the comparator, with five medications considered poor (70%) and two moderate (30%). Regarding the quality of evidence, most studies showed a low risk of bias and a partially adequate design. Conclusions In recent years, there has been an increase in the development of drugs for prostate cancer. However, the Added Therapeutic Value shows a small to moderate increase in survival compared to existing treatments. Many studies used a placebo instead of comparing new medications with available therapies. The PII indicates that, despite advancements, new technologies are needed to improve patient survival.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646232400223x
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP52 Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index – FDA-Approved Prostate Cancer Medications (2011 To 2021): A Case Study

Juliana Álvares-Teodoro, Francisco de Assis Acúrcio, Augusto Guerra, Ludmila Gargano et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PP52 Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index – FDA-Approved Prostate Cancer Medications (2011 To 2021): A Case Study

Juliana Álvares-Teodoro, Francisco de Assis Acúrcio, Augusto Guerra, Ludmila Gargano, Isabela Freitas, Ariane André
article en

Abstract

Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) constitutes 13.5% of all cancer cases globally. Treatment is individualized and depends on various factors. In recent years, there has been an increase in the approval of drugs for the disease by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study aimed to assess the innovativeness of FDA-approved drugs for PC treatment from 2011 to 2021. Methods A search was conducted in the FDA database to identify medications approved from 2011 to 2021 and their supporting studies for approval. The assessment of the value of innovations was performed through the Pharmaceutical Innovativeness Index (PII), a methodology that quantitatively evaluates innovations in four domains: Therapeutic Need and Added Therapeutic Value of the new medication (graded on five levels from important to absent), and Study Design and Methodological Quality (graded on three levels) of the pivotal studies used as a data source for evaluation. Medications are assessed for a specific clinical indication and compared to available therapeutic alternatives. Results Seven medications were identified for the treatment of PC, targeting different stages of the disease. The drugs were evaluated with a score ranging from 0 to 100, measuring the degree of innovativeness across the four assessed domains. Five (70%) medications scored above 50.0. The majority of the medications addressed a significant Therapeutic Need (n=4; 56%). The Added Therapeutic Value was assessed based on the survival gain compared to the comparator, with five medications considered poor (70%) and two moderate (30%). Regarding the quality of evidence, most studies showed a low risk of bias and a partially adequate design. Conclusions In recent years, there has been an increase in the development of drugs for prostate cancer. However, the Added Therapeutic Value shows a small to moderate increase in survival compared to existing treatments. Many studies used a placebo instead of comparing new medications with available therapies. The PII indicates that, despite advancements, new technologies are needed to improve patient survival.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.