PD85 Are Current Payment Models For Integrated Care Promoting The Uptake of Medical Device Innovations?

Introduction Integrated care (IC) is a patient-centered approach to the provision of health care that overcomes the fragmentation in the delivery of services that often occurs in older people with multiple comorbidities. Medical device innovations could help tackle this and other challenges of health systems when facing the adoption of high quality IC. Nevertheless, this should be accompanied by the right innovation funding scheme to encourage adoption. Methods A systematic search strategy to identify payment models for IC was performed in PubMed for the period from 2014 to 2023 using the International Foundation for Integrated Care Knowledge Tree tool. This was complemented with both a gray literature search in Google and a benchmark of payment models for innovative medicines. A scoping review was then performed identifying the following information: payment scheme; advantages and disadvantages for IC; inclusion of innovation; type of IC program or initiative described (sectors and providers); population (therapeutic area); country; and whether the information was conceptual or empirical. Results According to the literature reviewed, five payment schemes used in IC were identified. However, they were rarely used in isolation; more often a mix of payment schemes was used. Based on conceptual and empirical articles, the combination of bundled payment, shared savings, and pay for performance (based on the quality of care delivered) seemed to be the most comprehensive payment scheme. However, references to inclusion of innovation were not mentioned even in this mixed system. Payment systems for innovative medicines were benchmarked for medical devices. Conclusions A mixed system of bundled payment, shared savings, and pay for performance appears to be the most complete payment model for IC, since it counteracts the limitations of individual funding schemes. No evidence was found on how to incentivize medical device innovation in the context of IC delivery. However, inspiration from current payment schemes for innovative medicines can provide a starting point for innovative medical device schemes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324003350
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD85 Are Current Payment Models For Integrated Care Promoting The Uptake of Medical Device Innovations?

Laura Sampietro-Colom, Ismail Abbas, Marcelo Soto, Ana Lopez Alonso et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PD85 Are Current Payment Models For Integrated Care Promoting The Uptake of Medical Device Innovations?

Laura Sampietro-Colom, Ismail Abbas, Marcelo Soto, Ana Lopez Alonso, Paula Closa Granados
article en

Abstract

Introduction Integrated care (IC) is a patient-centered approach to the provision of health care that overcomes the fragmentation in the delivery of services that often occurs in older people with multiple comorbidities. Medical device innovations could help tackle this and other challenges of health systems when facing the adoption of high quality IC. Nevertheless, this should be accompanied by the right innovation funding scheme to encourage adoption. Methods A systematic search strategy to identify payment models for IC was performed in PubMed for the period from 2014 to 2023 using the International Foundation for Integrated Care Knowledge Tree tool. This was complemented with both a gray literature search in Google and a benchmark of payment models for innovative medicines. A scoping review was then performed identifying the following information: payment scheme; advantages and disadvantages for IC; inclusion of innovation; type of IC program or initiative described (sectors and providers); population (therapeutic area); country; and whether the information was conceptual or empirical. Results According to the literature reviewed, five payment schemes used in IC were identified. However, they were rarely used in isolation; more often a mix of payment schemes was used. Based on conceptual and empirical articles, the combination of bundled payment, shared savings, and pay for performance (based on the quality of care delivered) seemed to be the most comprehensive payment scheme. However, references to inclusion of innovation were not mentioned even in this mixed system. Payment systems for innovative medicines were benchmarked for medical devices. Conclusions A mixed system of bundled payment, shared savings, and pay for performance appears to be the most complete payment model for IC, since it counteracts the limitations of individual funding schemes. No evidence was found on how to incentivize medical device innovation in the context of IC delivery. However, inspiration from current payment schemes for innovative medicines can provide a starting point for innovative medical device schemes.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.