PD142 Implantable Neurostimulation Devices For The Treatment Of Drug-Resistant Pediatric Epilepsy

Introduction Epilepsy affects approximately 10.5 million individuals under the age of 15 years worldwide. In Spain, 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitants aged 6 to 14 years have epilepsy, making it the third most common neurological emergency. Drug resistance is observed in eight to 33 percent of cases. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) systems could improve seizure control in pediatric patients who are not eligible for brain surgery. Methods We systematically searched for articles published up to September 2022 in the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL. We included primary experimental and observational studies as well as case series studies addressing the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of RNS in the treatment of drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy. Results Two systematic reviews of prospective and retrospective case series studies and four primary experimental studies were identified. The case series studies found that a large proportion of pediatric patients responded to RNS, with a reduction of between 50 and 75 percent in the frequency of seizures. The intensity and duration of seizures also decreased after using RNS. Adverse effects of the RNS implantation process were related to infections, erythema, and hematomas. Only one study (n=17) reported moderate adverse effects related to stimulation (dysesthetic pain in the upper and lower right limb), but there were no serious reactions leading to RNS discontinuation. Conclusions Randomized controlled trials in pediatric drug-resistant populations ineligible for brain surgery with adequate sample sizes are needed to determine the effectiveness of RNS in terms of seizure frequency, duration, and intensity. No cost-effectiveness studies have been conducted on RNS in this cohort.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324003787
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD142 Implantable Neurostimulation Devices For The Treatment Of Drug-Resistant Pediatric Epilepsy

Yolanda Álvarez‐Pérez, Andrea Duarte‐Díaz, Yadira González‐Hernández, Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

PD142 Implantable Neurostimulation Devices For The Treatment Of Drug-Resistant Pediatric Epilepsy

Yolanda Álvarez‐Pérez, Andrea Duarte‐Díaz, Yadira González‐Hernández, Lilisbeth Perestelo‐Pérez, Amado Rivero‐Santana, Analía Abt Sacks, Anthea Santos-Álvarez, Vanesa Ramos García, Francisco Rivas-Ruiz
article en

Abstract

Introduction Epilepsy affects approximately 10.5 million individuals under the age of 15 years worldwide. In Spain, 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitants aged 6 to 14 years have epilepsy, making it the third most common neurological emergency. Drug resistance is observed in eight to 33 percent of cases. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) systems could improve seizure control in pediatric patients who are not eligible for brain surgery. Methods We systematically searched for articles published up to September 2022 in the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL. We included primary experimental and observational studies as well as case series studies addressing the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of RNS in the treatment of drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy. Results Two systematic reviews of prospective and retrospective case series studies and four primary experimental studies were identified. The case series studies found that a large proportion of pediatric patients responded to RNS, with a reduction of between 50 and 75 percent in the frequency of seizures. The intensity and duration of seizures also decreased after using RNS. Adverse effects of the RNS implantation process were related to infections, erythema, and hematomas. Only one study (n=17) reported moderate adverse effects related to stimulation (dysesthetic pain in the upper and lower right limb), but there were no serious reactions leading to RNS discontinuation. Conclusions Randomized controlled trials in pediatric drug-resistant populations ineligible for brain surgery with adequate sample sizes are needed to determine the effectiveness of RNS in terms of seizure frequency, duration, and intensity. No cost-effectiveness studies have been conducted on RNS in this cohort.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.