PD224 Evaluating Participant Satisfaction In Health Technology Assessment Reports: A Survey Study In Catalonia, Spain

Introduction Developing a health technology assessment (HTA) report requires the involvement of relevant stakeholders, specifically healthcare professionals, patients, and industry representatives. Evaluating the satisfaction of participants in HTA reports is crucial to improving internal procedures and increasing the participation of stakeholders, who play a crucial role in adding knowledge and experience to the reports. Methods We developed a nine-question survey to assess the satisfaction of healthcare professionals and patients involved in HTA reports. The questions evaluated global satisfaction with participating in the HTA report (scored 0 to 10), as well as with the information received to develop tasks within the report and the time given to perform them. Healthcare professionals (n=86), patients (n=3), and contributors to outcome prioritization (n=4) involved in 12 HTA reports developed in Catalonia, Spain were invited to participate. Results Thirty-two contributors (34.4%) responded. Twenty-nine were healthcare professionals (33.7% response rate) and three were patients (100% response rate); 59.4 percent of respondents had only participated in one HTA report. Contributors rated their participation with 8.53 points, with external reviewers and patients being the most satisfied collaborators (9.33 and 9.00 points, respectively). Twenty-eight participants (87.5%) felt they had received enough information to develop their tasks in the report, while the other four (12.5%) would have preferred more specific information about the aims of the evaluation. All but one contributor was satisfied with the amount of time given to perform the required tasks. Conclusions Collaborators in HTA reports were satisfied with their participation. Both the information provided about the tasks and the time provided to perform them were adequate. Nevertheless, the assessment team must always ensure that the aims of the evaluation are clear to everyone. We plan to evaluate the satisfaction of industry collaborators in the near future.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324004434
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD224 Evaluating Participant Satisfaction In Health Technology Assessment Reports: A Survey Study In Catalonia, Spain

M.D. Sabadell, Carolina Moltó-Puigmartí, Jessica Ruiz‐Baena, Edurne Gallastegui et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PD224 Evaluating Participant Satisfaction In Health Technology Assessment Reports: A Survey Study In Catalonia, Spain

M.D. Sabadell, Carolina Moltó-Puigmartí, Jessica Ruiz‐Baena, Edurne Gallastegui, Rosa Maria Vivanco‐Hidalgo, Anna Godo, Laura Llinàs-Mallol, oan Segur-Ferrer
article en

Abstract

Introduction Developing a health technology assessment (HTA) report requires the involvement of relevant stakeholders, specifically healthcare professionals, patients, and industry representatives. Evaluating the satisfaction of participants in HTA reports is crucial to improving internal procedures and increasing the participation of stakeholders, who play a crucial role in adding knowledge and experience to the reports. Methods We developed a nine-question survey to assess the satisfaction of healthcare professionals and patients involved in HTA reports. The questions evaluated global satisfaction with participating in the HTA report (scored 0 to 10), as well as with the information received to develop tasks within the report and the time given to perform them. Healthcare professionals (n=86), patients (n=3), and contributors to outcome prioritization (n=4) involved in 12 HTA reports developed in Catalonia, Spain were invited to participate. Results Thirty-two contributors (34.4%) responded. Twenty-nine were healthcare professionals (33.7% response rate) and three were patients (100% response rate); 59.4 percent of respondents had only participated in one HTA report. Contributors rated their participation with 8.53 points, with external reviewers and patients being the most satisfied collaborators (9.33 and 9.00 points, respectively). Twenty-eight participants (87.5%) felt they had received enough information to develop their tasks in the report, while the other four (12.5%) would have preferred more specific information about the aims of the evaluation. All but one contributor was satisfied with the amount of time given to perform the required tasks. Conclusions Collaborators in HTA reports were satisfied with their participation. Both the information provided about the tasks and the time provided to perform them were adequate. Nevertheless, the assessment team must always ensure that the aims of the evaluation are clear to everyone. We plan to evaluate the satisfaction of industry collaborators in the near future.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.