PP40 The Use Of “Softer” Outcomes In The NICE Health Technology Assessment Process: The Case Of Multiple Sclerosis

Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by a significant humanistic burden, as this is a chronic progressive disease associated with high levels of disability and need for caregiver support. Our objective was to explore to what extent “softer” outcome measures are considered as part of the health technology assessment (HTA) process of medications evaluated for the management of MS. Methods We performed a review of all Technology Appraisal Guidance (TAs) available at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) website, relating to the management of MS, in order to identify outcomes used either by the manufacturer or discussed by the Committee, that were beyond the typical ones around the clinical evidence, side effects, and costs associated with each technology under evaluation. The review focused on outcomes relating to the caregiver burden, the ease of use of the medication under evaluation, and the fatigue reported by patients. Results Fifteen TAs were identified. Eight (53%) of the TAs included information on the caregiver burden, where the manufacturers applied caregiver disutilities in the cost-effectiveness analyses, which were deemed appropriate by the Committee. Six (40%) of the TAs further included a discussion on the ease of use for specific medications where the Committee concluded that the benefits of the mode of administration may not have been captured in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Fatigue was discussed in two TAs; the Committee provided conflicting conclusions around this measure, but in the most recent TA, it recognized that fatigue was an important outcome measure. Conclusions Based on the above findings, it appears that “softer” outcome measures are deemed relevant in the HTA process for treatments aimed for MS, on top of the measures typically used in the HTA process; this highlights the importance of recording the humanistic burden of disease in a holistic way.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324002125
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PP40 The Use Of “Softer” Outcomes In The NICE Health Technology Assessment Process: The Case Of Multiple Sclerosis

Persefoni Kritikou, A. Rose
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PP40 The Use Of “Softer” Outcomes In The NICE Health Technology Assessment Process: The Case Of Multiple Sclerosis

Persefoni Kritikou, A. Rose
article en

Abstract

Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by a significant humanistic burden, as this is a chronic progressive disease associated with high levels of disability and need for caregiver support. Our objective was to explore to what extent “softer” outcome measures are considered as part of the health technology assessment (HTA) process of medications evaluated for the management of MS. Methods We performed a review of all Technology Appraisal Guidance (TAs) available at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) website, relating to the management of MS, in order to identify outcomes used either by the manufacturer or discussed by the Committee, that were beyond the typical ones around the clinical evidence, side effects, and costs associated with each technology under evaluation. The review focused on outcomes relating to the caregiver burden, the ease of use of the medication under evaluation, and the fatigue reported by patients. Results Fifteen TAs were identified. Eight (53%) of the TAs included information on the caregiver burden, where the manufacturers applied caregiver disutilities in the cost-effectiveness analyses, which were deemed appropriate by the Committee. Six (40%) of the TAs further included a discussion on the ease of use for specific medications where the Committee concluded that the benefits of the mode of administration may not have been captured in the cost-effectiveness analysis. Fatigue was discussed in two TAs; the Committee provided conflicting conclusions around this measure, but in the most recent TA, it recognized that fatigue was an important outcome measure. Conclusions Based on the above findings, it appears that “softer” outcome measures are deemed relevant in the HTA process for treatments aimed for MS, on top of the measures typically used in the HTA process; this highlights the importance of recording the humanistic burden of disease in a holistic way.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.