PD226 Integration Of Patient And Clinician Insights Into The European Union Joint Scientific Consultations And Joint Clinical Assessments

Introduction To summarize insights generated during the preceding four conventions of the European Access Academy (EAA) regarding the interface of patient organizations and medical societies with the evolving European Union (EU) health technology assessment (HTA) process. Methods In 2022 and 2023 four EAA conventions were held on the EU HTA regulation, focusing on: (i) its relevance for beating cancer; (ii) stakeholder involvement; (iii) recommended preparatory steps to ensure its successful implementation; and (iv) the role of hematology and oncology as a pacemaker for the EU HTA process. Here we summarize insights generated at the four EAA conventions about the integration of patient and clinician insights in the evolving EU HTA process, including joint scientific consultations (JSC) and joint clinical assessments (JCA). Results Throughout the conventions it became clear that the interface of patient associations and clinical societies with the EU HTA process is key for successful implementation of the regulation. All involved stakeholders rely on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM), including best internal and external evidence, patient values and expectations, and clinical experience. It was agreed that patient and clinician perspectives on the assessments are needed to balance the technical analysis of best external evidence. While patient input is rather well defined, when and how input from clinical societies is best incorporated during the process remains unclear. Conclusions As stipulated by the EBM triad, systematic involvement of patients and clinicians throughout both JSC and JCA is key to ensuring best outcomes for patients and society as a whole, in line with the objectives of the EU HTA regulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462324004458
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD226 Integration Of Patient And Clinician Insights Into The European Union Joint Scientific Consultations And Joint Clinical Assessments

Maureen Rutten‐van Mölken, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Begoña Pérez‐Valderrama, Heiner C. Bucher et al.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

PD226 Integration Of Patient And Clinician Insights Into The European Union Joint Scientific Consultations And Joint Clinical Assessments

Maureen Rutten‐van Mölken, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Begoña Pérez‐Valderrama, Heiner C. Bucher, Mondher Toumi, Wim Goettsch, Walter Van Dyck, Daniel S. Widmer, Tomas Salmonson, Jörg Ruof, Oriol Solà-Morales, Robin Doeswijk, Renato Bernardini, Elaine Julian, Francine Brinkhuis, Mira Pavlovic, R. Giuliani, Antonella Cardone, Bernhard J. Woermann
article en

Abstract

Introduction To summarize insights generated during the preceding four conventions of the European Access Academy (EAA) regarding the interface of patient organizations and medical societies with the evolving European Union (EU) health technology assessment (HTA) process. Methods In 2022 and 2023 four EAA conventions were held on the EU HTA regulation, focusing on: (i) its relevance for beating cancer; (ii) stakeholder involvement; (iii) recommended preparatory steps to ensure its successful implementation; and (iv) the role of hematology and oncology as a pacemaker for the EU HTA process. Here we summarize insights generated at the four EAA conventions about the integration of patient and clinician insights in the evolving EU HTA process, including joint scientific consultations (JSC) and joint clinical assessments (JCA). Results Throughout the conventions it became clear that the interface of patient associations and clinical societies with the EU HTA process is key for successful implementation of the regulation. All involved stakeholders rely on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM), including best internal and external evidence, patient values and expectations, and clinical experience. It was agreed that patient and clinician perspectives on the assessments are needed to balance the technical analysis of best external evidence. While patient input is rather well defined, when and how input from clinical societies is best incorporated during the process remains unclear. Conclusions As stipulated by the EBM triad, systematic involvement of patients and clinicians throughout both JSC and JCA is key to ensuring best outcomes for patients and society as a whole, in line with the objectives of the EU HTA regulation.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health CareVol. 40(S1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.