Identifying Metadata Quality Issues Across Cultures

Metadata are crucial for discovery and access by providing contextual, technical, and administrative information in a standard form. Yet metadata are also sites of tension between sociocultural representations, resource constraints, and standardized systems. Formal and informal interventions may be interpreted as quality issues, political acts to assert identity, or strategic choices to maximize visibility. In this context, we sought to understand how metadata quality, consistency, and completeness impact individuals and communities. Reviewing a sample of records, we identified and classified issues stemming from how metadata and communities press up against each other to intentionally reflect (or not) cultural meanings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
College & Research Libraries
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.86.1.101
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Metadata Quality Issues Across Cultures

Marco Tullney, Mike Nason, Juan Pablo Alperín, Julie Shi
4 citations
College & Research Libraries
Library Science and Information Systems
12.98
article

Identifying Metadata Quality Issues Across Cultures

Marco Tullney, Mike Nason, Juan Pablo Alperín, Julie Shi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Metadata are crucial for discovery and access by providing contextual, technical, and administrative information in a standard form. Yet metadata are also sites of tension between sociocultural representations, resource constraints, and standardized systems. Formal and informal interventions may be interpreted as quality issues, political acts to assert identity, or strategic choices to maximize visibility. In this context, we sought to understand how metadata quality, consistency, and completeness impact individuals and communities. Reviewing a sample of records, we identified and classified issues stemming from how metadata and communities press up against each other to intentionally reflect (or not) cultural meanings.

College & Research LibrariesVol. 86(1)
Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) (DE), Digital Science (United States) (US), Crossref (US), Public Knowledge (US), Alpha Environmental (United States) (US), SAGE Publishing (United States) (US), Public Knowledge Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Library Science and Information Systems
12.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.