Estimating the financial value of scientific journals and APCs using visibility factors: A new methodological approach

Not all scientific journals that offer open access publication charge the same Article Processing Charges (APC), even within the same publishing group. The hypothesis is that this variation is related to the journal's prestige and impact indicators, which reflect the value the journal provides to authors. This study examines the relationship between these indicators and proposes a method to estimate the APC that should correspond to each journal. Additionally, based on the estimated APC and the articles published over the past five years, a method is proposed to determine the value of a journal. Using these values, the relationship between the estimated APC and the published APC is analyzed, along with the distributions of estimated APCs and journal values. The average and cumulative values are also studied by publisher and by the most developed countries. Finally, a significant correlation is observed between the cumulative estimated journal values and the scientific output of countries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
El Profesional de la Informacion
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2024.0512
Citations
3
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the financial value of scientific journals and APCs using visibility factors: A new methodological approach

Rodrigo Sánchez Jiménez, Gali Halevi, Vicente P. Guerrero‐Bote, Félix De-Moya Anegón
3 citations
El Profesional de la Informacion
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.38
article

Estimating the financial value of scientific journals and APCs using visibility factors: A new methodological approach

Rodrigo Sánchez Jiménez, Gali Halevi, Vicente P. Guerrero‐Bote, Félix De-Moya Anegón
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Not all scientific journals that offer open access publication charge the same Article Processing Charges (APC), even within the same publishing group. The hypothesis is that this variation is related to the journal's prestige and impact indicators, which reflect the value the journal provides to authors. This study examines the relationship between these indicators and proposes a method to estimate the APC that should correspond to each journal. Additionally, based on the estimated APC and the articles published over the past five years, a method is proposed to determine the value of a journal. Using these values, the relationship between the estimated APC and the published APC is analyzed, along with the distributions of estimated APCs and journal values. The average and cumulative values are also studied by publisher and by the most developed countries. Finally, a significant correlation is observed between the cumulative estimated journal values and the scientific output of countries.

El Profesional de la InformacionVol. 33(5)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimating the financial value of scientific journals and APCs using visibility factors: A new methodological approach — Rodrigo Sánchez Jiménez, Gali Halevi, et al. · El Profesional de la Informacion (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS