Epitypification of the Linnaean name Lemna arrhiza (≡ Wolffia arrhiza), Araceae

During our research on the genus Wolffia (Araceae) in Ukraine, we have investigated the typification status of the Linnaean name Lemna arrhiza (≡ Wolffia arrhiza). This name was typified twice, first using a “neotype” proposed by Landolt in 1994, and then a lectotype designated by Iamonico and Iberite in 2014. The “neotype” (a herbarium specimen preserved at FI) does not meet the requirements of Art. 9.8 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), because it is not part of the original material for Lemna arrhiza and, therefore, cannot be considered for the lectotypification purpose (Art. 9.3 and 9.4 of the ICN). On the other hand, the lectotype designated by Iamonico and Iberite (an illustration in the book by Micheli) fully complies with the provisions of the Code. However, Micheli’s illustration is demonstrably ambiguous and cannot be critically identified for purposes of the precise application of the name of Lemna arrhiza; therefore it was advisable to designate an epitype, following Art. 9.9 of ICN. The specimen from Micheli's Herbarium (barcode FI123857) is thus designated here as the epitype.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ukrainian Botanical Journal
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj81.06.408
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epitypification of the Linnaean name Lemna arrhiza (≡ Wolffia arrhiza), Araceae

N.M. Shiyan
Ukrainian Botanical Journal
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Epitypification of the Linnaean name Lemna arrhiza (≡ Wolffia arrhiza), Araceae

N.M. Shiyan
article en

Abstract

During our research on the genus Wolffia (Araceae) in Ukraine, we have investigated the typification status of the Linnaean name Lemna arrhiza (≡ Wolffia arrhiza). This name was typified twice, first using a “neotype” proposed by Landolt in 1994, and then a lectotype designated by Iamonico and Iberite in 2014. The “neotype” (a herbarium specimen preserved at FI) does not meet the requirements of Art. 9.8 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), because it is not part of the original material for Lemna arrhiza and, therefore, cannot be considered for the lectotypification purpose (Art. 9.3 and 9.4 of the ICN). On the other hand, the lectotype designated by Iamonico and Iberite (an illustration in the book by Micheli) fully complies with the provisions of the Code. However, Micheli’s illustration is demonstrably ambiguous and cannot be critically identified for purposes of the precise application of the name of Lemna arrhiza; therefore it was advisable to designate an epitype, following Art. 9.9 of ICN. The specimen from Micheli's Herbarium (barcode FI123857) is thus designated here as the epitype.

Ukrainian Botanical JournalVol. 81(6)
Sapienza Università di Roma, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Division of Environmental Biology
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.