Hardware-in-the-Loop Modeling and Simulation of the Fin Control Subsystem with DSP

The objective of this work is the comparison between two different methods for Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) simulations for a fin positioning control on a more electric aircraft. One, a well established commercial platform (Typhoon HIL 602+) and the other using a Texas Instrument F28379D microcontroller. For the implementation on the microcontroller, one of the cores is responsible for the simulation of the model of a Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine based on the Typhoon HIL documentation, while the other is responsible for the control of the system. For the HIL simulation on the Typhoon HIL, the same model of the PMSM is to be used on the Typhoon HIL, while the control of the system is also made by one of the cores of the microcontroller. As the purpose is the comparison, the control strategy is the same for both simulations and it is based on the well established Field Oriented Control (FOC) with a difference on the stator current control, in which the Model Predictive Current Control (MPCC) is used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/esars-itec60450.2024.10819848
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Real-time simulation and control systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hardware-in-the-Loop Modeling and Simulation of the Fin Control Subsystem with DSP

Matheus Sotero, Gabriel Mello, Bernardo F. de Andrade Campos, Izabela Cristine da Silva et al.
2 citations
Real-time simulation and control systems
0.66
article

Hardware-in-the-Loop Modeling and Simulation of the Fin Control Subsystem with DSP

Matheus Sotero, Gabriel Mello, Bernardo F. de Andrade Campos, Izabela Cristine da Silva, L.G.B. Rolim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The objective of this work is the comparison between two different methods for Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) simulations for a fin positioning control on a more electric aircraft. One, a well established commercial platform (Typhoon HIL 602+) and the other using a Texas Instrument F28379D microcontroller. For the implementation on the microcontroller, one of the cores is responsible for the simulation of the model of a Three-Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine based on the Typhoon HIL documentation, while the other is responsible for the control of the system. For the HIL simulation on the Typhoon HIL, the same model of the PMSM is to be used on the Typhoon HIL, while the control of the system is also made by one of the cores of the microcontroller. As the purpose is the comparison, the control strategy is the same for both simulations and it is based on the well established Field Oriented Control (FOC) with a difference on the stator current control, in which the Model Predictive Current Control (MPCC) is used.

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Real-time simulation and control systems
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hardware-in-the-Loop Modeling and Simulation of the Fin Control Subsystem with DSP — Matheus Sotero, Gabriel Mello, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS