Swift Quasi-Peak Detector Implementation using Neural Network

This paper presents an Python implementation of a CISPR 16-1-1 time-domain EMI receiver for post-processing of transient data originating from circuit simulation or oscilloscope measurement. The scientific novelty is the implementation of the Quasi-Peak (QP) detector with the help of machine learning (ML). The QP ML-model is trained with an automated lab-oratory setup using an actual EMI receiver and parameterized impulse burst train stimuli. The advantage of the proposed model is that it can very quickly and accurately predict QP readings from only one period of transient input data. In contrast, classic QP detector implementations require a waveform input of at least 2 seconds and a model of the critically damped meter to evaluate the settled QP reading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/esars-itec60450.2024.10819823
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Particle Detector Development and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swift Quasi-Peak Detector Implementation using Neural Network

Herbert Hackl, Jacob Reynvaan, Bernhard Auinger, Martin Stoiber
2 citations
Particle Detector Development and Performance
1.32
article

Swift Quasi-Peak Detector Implementation using Neural Network

Herbert Hackl, Jacob Reynvaan, Bernhard Auinger, Martin Stoiber
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an Python implementation of a CISPR 16-1-1 time-domain EMI receiver for post-processing of transient data originating from circuit simulation or oscilloscope measurement. The scientific novelty is the implementation of the Quasi-Peak (QP) detector with the help of machine learning (ML). The QP ML-model is trained with an automated lab-oratory setup using an actual EMI receiver and parameterized impulse burst train stimuli. The advantage of the proposed model is that it can very quickly and accurately predict QP readings from only one period of transient input data. In contrast, classic QP detector implementations require a waveform input of at least 2 seconds and a model of the critically damped meter to evaluate the settled QP reading.

Silicon Austria Labs (Austria) (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Particle Detector Development and Performance
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.