A Novel Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique for Multiclass Imbalance Problems
Multi-class imbalanced datasets present significant challenges in many real-world classification tasks, where certain classes are severely underrepresented. This study addresses the classification problems with multi-class imbalanced datasets, which are inherently more complicated than binary imbalanced problems. To tackle this problem, a novel and effective method called the One-vs-One Center Hybrid Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (OCH-SMOTE) algorithm is proposed, which combines the enhanced Synthetic Minority Oversampling Techniques (SMOTE) with the One-vs-One (OVO) decomposition strategy. The OCH-SMOTE algorithm comprises two key components: the OVO strategy is used to decompose the multi-class imbalanced datasets, and the enhanced CH-SMOTE algorithm is used to generate the balanced training datasets to improve the classification performance. The OCH-SMOTE algorithm is extensively evaluated on 18 real-world multi-class imbalanced datasets, using the CART decision tree as the base classifier. The proposed method is compared with classical and state-of-the-art oversampling methods. On average, the OCH-SMOTE algorithm improves <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">P<sub>macro</sub></i> by 8.19%, MAVA by 9.19%, MG by 30.68%, MFM by 8.78%, and Kappa coefficient by 0.0462 across all datasets compared to the baseline methods. The experimental results demonstrate that the OCH-SMOTE algorithm significantly enhances multi-class imbalanced datasets classification performance.
Authors
- Norhashidah Awang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-7193)
- Jiao Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-1807)
Institutions
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Puer University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3526673
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Transport Systems and Technology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.85