AI Thinking: a framework for rethinking artificial intelligence in practice

Artificial intelligence is transforming the way we work with information across disciplines and practical contexts. A growing range of disciplines are now involved in studying, developing and assessing the use of AI in practice, but these disciplines often employ conflicting understandings of what AI is and what is involved in its use. New, interdisciplinary approaches are needed to bridge competing conceptualizations of AI in practice and help shape the future of AI use. I propose a novel conceptual framework called AI Thinking, which models key decisions and considerations involved in AI use across disciplinary perspectives. AI Thinking addresses five practice-based competencies involved in applying AI in context: motivating AI use, formulating AI methods, assessing available tools and technologies, selecting appropriate data and situating AI in the sociotechnical contexts it is used in. A hypothetical case study is provided to illustrate the application of AI Thinking in practice. This article situates AI Thinking in broader cross-disciplinary discourses of AI, including its connections to ongoing discussions around AI literacy and AI-driven innovation. AI Thinking can help to bridge between the work of diverse disciplines, contexts and actors in the AI space, and shape AI efforts in education, industrial development and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241482
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Thinking: a framework for rethinking artificial intelligence in practice

Denis Newman-Griffis
10 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.66
article

AI Thinking: a framework for rethinking artificial intelligence in practice

Denis Newman-Griffis
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is transforming the way we work with information across disciplines and practical contexts. A growing range of disciplines are now involved in studying, developing and assessing the use of AI in practice, but these disciplines often employ conflicting understandings of what AI is and what is involved in its use. New, interdisciplinary approaches are needed to bridge competing conceptualizations of AI in practice and help shape the future of AI use. I propose a novel conceptual framework called AI Thinking, which models key decisions and considerations involved in AI use across disciplinary perspectives. AI Thinking addresses five practice-based competencies involved in applying AI in context: motivating AI use, formulating AI methods, assessing available tools and technologies, selecting appropriate data and situating AI in the sociotechnical contexts it is used in. A hypothetical case study is provided to illustrate the application of AI Thinking in practice. This article situates AI Thinking in broader cross-disciplinary discourses of AI, including its connections to ongoing discussions around AI literacy and AI-driven innovation. AI Thinking can help to bridge between the work of diverse disciplines, contexts and actors in the AI space, and shape AI efforts in education, industrial development and policy.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(1)
University College London (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Wellcome Trust, “la Caixa” Foundation, Michael Smith Health Research BC, University College London, Volkswagen Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Universiteit Leiden, Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Koning Boudewijnstichting, Novo Nordisk Fonden, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Australian Research Council, Research England
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.