Predicting the effect of landscape structure on epidemic invasion using an analytical estimate for infection rate
The influence of landscape structure on epidemic invasion of agricultural crops is often underestimated in the construction and analysis of epidemiological models. Computer simulations of individual-based models (IBMs) are widely used to characterize disease spread under different management scenarios but can be slow in exploring large numbers of different landscape configurations. Here, we address the problem of finding an analytical measure of the impact of the spatial structure of a crop landscape on the invasion and spread of plant pathogens. We explore the potential of using an analytical approximation for the rate, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math> , at which susceptible crop fields become infected at the start of an epidemic to predict the effect that the spatial structure of a host landscape will have on an epidemic. We demonstrate the validity of this approach using two models: (i) a general IBM of the invasion and spread of a pathogen through an abstract host landscape; and (ii) an IBM of a real-life example for a virus disease spreading through a cassava landscape. Finally, we demonstrate that the analytical approach based on an estimate of the rate, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math> , can be used to identify spatial structures that effect deceleration of an invading pathogen.
Authors
- Christopher A. Gilligan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-0003)
- Yevhen F. Suprunenko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-7571)
- Stephen J. Cornell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-5236)
Institutions
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Royal Society Open Science
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240763
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 12.25
Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation