Analysis of US Industrial Assessment Centers (IACs) implementation

Industrial energy assessments are a fundamental action toward developing a decarbonization strategy at any level. They provide an understanding of where energy efficiency opportunities exist and help to make informed business decisions about the costs and benefits of implementing sustainable policies and practices. This paper examines the effectiveness of the Department of Energy’s Industrial Assessment Centers Program at providing useful energy-efficiency audits as well as the barriers faced by the program and plans for future growth and improvement. This paper presents an analysis of the program between 1981 and 2022, covering 20,290 industrial assessments and 151,198 recommendations, with $2.6 billion of recommended savings. The analysis includes a breakdown of the IAC recommendations and implemented projects based on both the industrial subsectors according to the Standard Industrial Classification code, energy type, and systems evaluated. The results include a 47% implementation rate, a gap analysis to understand the missed opportunities, and a discussion about reasons for recommendation rejection. A comparison of the IAC Program with other country-level energy auditing or assessment programs was conducted, and suggestions for improving implementation rates were mentioned. • The analysis covered 20,000+ assessments and 150,000+ recommendations for 1981-2022 • Lighting, compressed air, and motor systems improvements were most recommended • Implemented savings from this period was $854 M, 97.2 QBtu, and 12.4 M Tons CO 2 • The rejection reasons were assessed, and suggestions for improvement were provided • The IAC program was compared with international industrial energy audit programs

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134415
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Research, Science, and Academia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of US Industrial Assessment Centers (IACs) implementation

Ahmad Abbas, Sachin Nimbalkar, Thomas Wenning, Kalie Miera
1 citations
Energy
Research, Science, and Academia
4.17
article

Analysis of US Industrial Assessment Centers (IACs) implementation

Ahmad Abbas, Sachin Nimbalkar, Thomas Wenning, Kalie Miera
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Industrial energy assessments are a fundamental action toward developing a decarbonization strategy at any level. They provide an understanding of where energy efficiency opportunities exist and help to make informed business decisions about the costs and benefits of implementing sustainable policies and practices. This paper examines the effectiveness of the Department of Energy’s Industrial Assessment Centers Program at providing useful energy-efficiency audits as well as the barriers faced by the program and plans for future growth and improvement. This paper presents an analysis of the program between 1981 and 2022, covering 20,290 industrial assessments and 151,198 recommendations, with $2.6 billion of recommended savings. The analysis includes a breakdown of the IAC recommendations and implemented projects based on both the industrial subsectors according to the Standard Industrial Classification code, energy type, and systems evaluated. The results include a 47% implementation rate, a gap analysis to understand the missed opportunities, and a discussion about reasons for recommendation rejection. A comparison of the IAC Program with other country-level energy auditing or assessment programs was conducted, and suggestions for improving implementation rates were mentioned. • The analysis covered 20,000+ assessments and 150,000+ recommendations for 1981-2022 • Lighting, compressed air, and motor systems improvements were most recommended • Implemented savings from this period was $854 M, 97.2 QBtu, and 12.4 M Tons CO 2 • The rejection reasons were assessed, and suggestions for improvement were provided • The IAC program was compared with international industrial energy audit programs

EnergyVol. 315
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), National Transportation Research Center (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Research, Science, and Academia
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.